EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

The Relative Importance of Employer and Employee Effects on Compensation: A Comparison of France and the United States

John Abowd (), Francis Kramarz (), David Margolis and Kenneth Troske ()

Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) from HAL

Abstract: Using individual data on compensation, matched with establishment and firm data on performance and inputs, we compare the French and American pay systems. The compensation measures are decomposed into components related to measured individual characteristics, establishment–enterprise effects, and a residual. In France, the compensation outcomes are more compressed than in the United States. For France, individual characteristics and establishment effects explain more of the variability in compensation outcomes than in the United States. The observable and unobservable components of compensation are identically correlated in the two countries. The relations among compensation components (individual and establishment) and firm performance outcomes (value-added per worker, sales per worker, and profit per unit of capital) exhibit some important similarities and differences between the countries. Higher paid workers, either because of individual characteristics or establishment effects, are employed in firms that are more productive. Higher pay due to enterprise heterogeneity is associated with higher profitability in France but lower profitability in the United States.

Keywords: Employee; Effects; on; Compensation (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2001-12
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00353821
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (22) Track citations by RSS feed

Published in Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, Elsevier, 2001, 15 (4), pp.419-436. ⟨10.1006/jjie.2001.0475⟩

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
Journal Article: The Relative Importance of Employer and Employee Effects on Compensation: A Comparison of France and the United States (2001) Downloads
Working Paper: The Relative Importance of Employer and Employee Effects on Compensation: A Comparison of France and the United States (2001)
Working Paper: The Relative Importance of Employer and Employeee Effects on Compensation: a Comparison of France and the United States (1998)
Working Paper: The Relative Importance of Employer and Employee Effects on Compensation: A Comparison of France and the United States (1996)
Working Paper: The Relative Importance of Employer and Employee Effects on Compensation: A Comparison of France and the United States (1996)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:cesptp:halshs-00353821

DOI: 10.1006/jjie.2001.0475

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().

 
Page updated 2022-01-08
Handle: RePEc:hal:cesptp:halshs-00353821