Dishonesty under Scrutiny

Jeroen van de Ven () and Marie Claire Villeval

No 8638, IZA Discussion Papers from IZA Network @ LISER

Abstract: We investigate how different forms of scrutiny affect dishonesty, using Gneezy's (2005) deception game. We add a third player whose interests are aligned with those of the sender. We find that lying behavior is not sensitive to revealing the sender's identity to the observer. The option for observers to communicate with the sender, and the option to reveal the sender's lies to the receiver also do not affect lying behavior. Even more striking, senders whose identity is revealed to their observer do not lie less when their interests are misaligned with those of the observer.

Keywords: deception; lies; dishonesty; social image; experiment (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C91 D83 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 34 pages
Date: 2014-11
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-cbe, nep-exp, nep-hpe and nep-soc
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Published - published in: Journal of the Economic Science Association, 2015, 1, 86-99

Downloads: (external link)
https://docs.iza.org/dp8638.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: Dishonesty under scrutiny (2015)
Working Paper: Dishonesty under scrutiny (2015)
Working Paper: Dishonesty under scrutiny (2014)
Working Paper: Dishonesty under scrutiny (2014)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:iza:izadps:dp8638

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in IZA Discussion Papers from IZA Network @ LISER Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Mark Fallak ().