Journal of Economic Methodology

1994 - 2026

Current editor(s): John Davis and D Wade Hands

From Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().

Access Statistics for this journal.
Is something missing from the series or not right? See the RePEc data check for the archive and series.

On the relations between philosophy and economics pp. 187-213: Terence Hutchison
Abstraction and unrealistic assumptions in economics pp. 215-236: Steven Rappaport
The rhetoric of policy relevance in international economics pp. 237-259: William Milberg
Towards a methodology of tendencies pp. 261-284: Piet-Hein van Eeghen
Equilibrium and time: Marshall's dilemma pp. 285-306: Neil Hart
Rationality and economic behavior pp. 307-315: Daniel Fusfeld
Book Reviews pp. 317-322: D. Wade Hands
Book Reviews pp. 322-333: Alan Kirman
Book Reviews pp. 334-342: Elias Khalil
Book Reviews pp. 342-347: Brian Loasby
Statement pp. 349-350: Mark Blaug and Kevin Hoover

Two portraits of economics pp. 1-38: Uskali Maki
A revision of the neoclassical economics methodology pp. 39-68: Geert Reuten
Robert Lowe and the role of the vulgar economist in the English Methodenstreit pp. 69-90: G. C. G. Moore
A Christian perspective on economics pp. 91-112: Clive Beed and Cara Beed
Postmodernism and economics: a middlebrow view pp. 113-120: Warren Samuels
Value-ladenness in economics: reply to Rosenbaum pp. 121-125: John Davis
Value-ladenness in economics: a rejoinder to Davis pp. 127-130: Eckehard Rosenbaum
Book Reviews pp. 131-138: Mary Morgan
Book Reviews pp. 138-144: Allin Cottrell
Book Reviews pp. 144-148: Hugo Keuzenkamp
A logical critique of mathematical formalism in economics pp. 151-169: Ken Dennis

A logical critique of mathematical formalism in economics pp. 181-200: Ken Dennis
The economist-as-audience needs a methodology of plausible inference pp. 201-222: Robert Goldfarb
On a maze of second thoughts and on the methodology of economic methodology pp. 223-238: Siobhain McGovern
Interpersonal comparisons of utility: positive, normative or value-laden? pp. 239-258: Eckehard Rosenbaum
Feminist economics: an Austrian perspective pp. 259-280: Steven Horwitz
Alchian and 'the Alchian thesis' pp. 281-286: Neil Kay
Some thoughts on multiplicity pp. 287-292: Warren Samuels
Book Reviews pp. 293-304: Roger Backhouse
Book Reviews pp. 304-311: Jack Birner

Tacit preachments are the worst kind pp. 1-33: Leland Yeager
Personal identity and standard economic theory pp. 35-52: John Davis
Samuelson's operationalist-descriptivist thesis pp. 53-78: Joshua Cohen
Animal spirits in his soup: a look at the methodology and rhetoric of The General Theory pp. 79-104: Craig Freedman
Is Milton Friedman an artist or a scientist? pp. 105-122: David Colander
Metaphors and time reversibility and irreversibility in economic systems pp. 123-134: Rod Cross
Book Reviews pp. 135-144: Roger Backhouse
Book Reviews pp. 144-148: D. Wade Hands
Book Reviews pp. 149-154: Julie Nelson
Book Reviews pp. 154-157: Tyler Cowen
Book Reviews pp. 158-163: David Levy

Methodology might matter, but Weintraub's meta-Methodology shouldn't pp. 215-232: Uskali Maki
Situational determinism revisited: scientific research programmes in economics twenty years on pp. 233-252: John Nightingale
Economic method and economic rhetoric pp. 253-268: John Maloney
Law and economics and the infinite regress in explaining rationality pp. 269-278: Bernard Verstegen
John von Neumann, scientific method and empirical economics pp. 279-294: Salim Rashid
Expanding the role of methodology pp. 295-300: Thomas Mayer
Book Reviews pp. 301-306: Vivienne Brown
Book Reviews pp. 307-313: Karen Vaughn
Book Reviews pp. 314-329: James Wible
Book Reviews pp. 330-334: Young Back Choi
Book Reviews pp. 335-339: Jeremy Shearmur

Why is there so much disagreement among economists? pp. 1-14: Thomas Mayer
How economists persuade pp. 15-32: Deirdre McCloskey
The fixation of economic beliefs pp. 33-42: Roger Backhouse
Vision, judgment, and disagreement among economists pp. 43-56: David Colander
Three images of economics and its progress pp. 57-64: Henry Woo
Econometrics as observation: the Lucas critique and the nature of econometric inference pp. 65-80: Kevin Hoover
Anthropologists and economists: conflict or cooperation? pp. 81-104: John Lodewijks
Why are so many economists so opposed to methodology? pp. 105-134: Tony Lawson
Charles Sanders Peirce's economy of research pp. 135-160: James Wible
Kenneth E. Boulding, 1910-1993 pp. 161-166: Elias Khalil
Book Reviews pp. 167-171: Robert Solow
Book Reviews pp. 172-179: Thomas Mayer
Book Reviews pp. 180-185: Robert Formaini
Book Reviews pp. 186-196: Bruna Ingrao
Book Reviews pp. 197-198: Kevin Hoover