Details about Christoph Engel

Homepage:	https://www.coll.mpg.de/engel.html
Workplace:	Max-Planck-Institut zur Erforschung von Gemeinschaftsgütern (Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods), Max-Planck-Gesellschaft (Max Planck Society), (more information at EDIRC)

Access statistics for papers by Christoph Engel.

Last updated 2025-01-06. Update your information in the RePEc Author Service.

Short-id: pen22

---

Jump to Journal Articles Edited books Chapters

Working Papers

2025

1. Professor GPT: Having a large language model write a commentary on freedom of assembly
   Discussion Paper Series of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods, Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods

2024

2. Asking GPT for the Ordinary Meaning of Statutory Terms
   Discussion Paper Series of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods, Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods
3. Deliberately Ignoring Unfairness: Responses to Uncertain Inequality in the Ultimatum Game
   Discussion Paper Series of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods, Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods
4. Experimental comparative law 2.0? Large language models as a novel empirical tool
   Discussion Paper Series of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods, Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods
5. Gewichtsformel – wörtlich genommen. Ein empirischer Test mit der Hilfe eines Sprachmodells
   Discussion Paper Series of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods, Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods
6. Integrating Machine Behavior into Human Subject Experiments: A User-Friendly Toolkit and Illustrations
   ECONtribute Discussion Papers Series, University of Bonn and University of Cologne, Germany
   Also in Discussion Paper Series of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods, Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods (2023)
7. The German Constitutional Court – Activist, but not Partisan?
   Discussion Paper Series of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods, Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods

2023

8. Treu und Glauben: Frag GPT
   Discussion Paper Series of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods, Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods

2022

9. Eye-Tracking as a Method for Legal Research
   Discussion Paper Series of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods, Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods
10. Judicial Decision-Making. A Survey of the Experimental Evidence
    Discussion Paper Series of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods, Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods
11. Lucky You: Your Case is Heard by a Seasoned Panel – Panel Effects in the German Constitutional Court
    Discussion Paper Series of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods, Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods View citations (4)

2021

12. Crime as Conditional Rule Violation
    Discussion Paper Series of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods, Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods
13. Religion and Tradition in Conflict Experimentally Testing the Power of Social Norms to Invalidate Religious Law
    Discussion Paper Series of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods, Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods
14. Wettbewerb und Gemeinwohl
    Discussion Paper Series of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods, Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods
15. What the Judge Argues is Not What the Judge Thinks - Eye Tracking Evidence about the Normative Weight of Conflicting Concerns in a Torts Case
    Discussion Paper Series of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods, Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods

2020

16. Challenges in the Interdisciplinary Use of Comparative Law
    Discussion Paper Series of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods, Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods
17. Does the Fundamental Transformation Deter Trade? An Experiment
    Discussion Paper Series of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods, Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods
    See also Journal Article Does the Fundamental Transformation Deter Trade? An Experiment, American Law and Economics Review, American Law and Economics Association (2023) (2023)
18. Manna from Heaven for Judges– Judges’ Reaction to a Quasi-Random Reduction in Caseload
    Discussion Paper Series of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods, Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods View citations (10)
    See also Journal Article Manna from Heaven for Judges: Judges’ Reaction to a Quasi‐Random Reduction in Caseload, Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, John Wiley & Sons (2020) View citations (8) (2020)
19. Property is Dummy Proof: An Experiment
    Discussion Paper Series of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods, Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods View citations (1)
20. Rechtswissenschaft als Sozialwissenschaft. Spurensuche im Jahrgang 2019 der ZGR
    Discussion Paper Series of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods, Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods

2019

21. Estimating Heterogeneous Reactions to Experimental Treatments
    Discussion Paper Series of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods, Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods
    See also Journal Article Estimating heterogeneous reactions to experimental treatments, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier (2020) View citations (1) (2020)
22. Tax Morale and Fairness in Conflict - An Experiment
    Discussion Paper Series of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods, Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods
    See also Journal Article Tax morale and fairness in conflict an experiment, Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier (2020) View citations (12) (2020)

2018

23. Diffusion of Legal Innovations: The Case of Israeli Class Actions
    Discussion Paper Series of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods, Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods View citations (1)
24. Do Explicit Reasons Make Legal Intervention More Effective? An Experimental Study
    Discussion Paper Series of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods, Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods View citations (1)
25. How Do Households Allocate Risk?
    SOEPpapers on Multidisciplinary Panel Data Research, DIW Berlin, The German Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP) View citations (4)
    Also in Working Papers, University of Liverpool, Department of Economics (2018) View citations (4)
26. The Proper Scope of Behavioral Law and Economics
    Discussion Paper Series of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods, Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods
27. Turning the Lab into Jeremy Bentham’s Panopticon. A Lab Experiment on the Transparency of Punishment
    Discussion Paper Series of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods, Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods View citations (6)

2017

28. Behaviorally Efficient Remedies – An Experiment
    Discussion Paper Series of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods, Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods
29. Committing the English and the Continental Way – An Experiment
    Discussion Paper Series of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods, Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods
30. Defendant Should Have the Last Word – Experimentally Manipulating Order and Provisional Assessment of the Facts in Criminal Procedure
    Discussion Paper Series of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods, Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods
31. Does Efficiency Trump Legality? The Case of the German Constitutional Court
    Discussion Paper Series of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods, Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods
32. Empirical Methods for the Law
    Discussion Paper Series of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods, Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods
    See also Journal Article Empirical Methods for the Law, Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics (JITE), Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen (2018) View citations (1) (2018)
33. Experimental Social Planners: Good Natured, but Overly Optimistic
    Discussion Paper Series of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods, Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods
34. How to Protect Entitlements: An Experiment
    Discussion Paper Series of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods, Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods
    See also Journal Article How to Protect Entitlements: An Experiment, Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press (2018) View citations (2) (2018)
35. People Are Conditional Rule Followers
    Discussion Paper Series of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods, Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods View citations (1)
    See also Journal Article People are conditional rule followers, Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier (2021) View citations (4) (2021)
36. The Valuation of Moral Rights: A Field Experiment
    Discussion Paper Series of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods, Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods View citations (2)

2016

37. A Random Shock Is Not Random Assignment
    Discussion Paper Series of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods, Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods View citations (4)
    See also Journal Article A random shock is not random assignment, Economics Letters, Elsevier (2016) View citations (4) (2016)
38. Experimental Criminal Law. A Survey of Contributions from Law, Economics and Criminology
    Discussion Paper Series of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods, Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods View citations (5)
39. Insuring Your Donation – An Experiment
    Discussion Paper Series of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods, Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods
40. Risk and punishment revisited Errors in variables and in the lab
    Jena Economics Research Papers, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena
    Also in Discussion Paper Series of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods, Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods (2016)
41. The Solidarity Motive
    Discussion Paper Series of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods, Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods
42. You Are In Charge – Experimentally Testing the Motivating Power of Holding a Judicial Office
    Discussion Paper Series of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods, Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods View citations (1)
    See also Journal Article You Are in Charge: Experimentally Testing the Motivating Power of Holding a Judicial Office, The Journal of Legal Studies, University of Chicago Press (2017) View citations (13) (2017)

2015

43. If the Worst Comes to the Worst. Dictator Giving When Recipient’s Endowments are Risky
    Discussion Paper Series of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods, Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods
    See also Journal Article If the worst comes to the worst: Dictator giving when recipient’s endowments are risky, European Economic Review, Elsevier (2018) View citations (4) (2018)
44. Modeling a Satisficing Judge
    Discussion Paper Series of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods, Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods
    See also Journal Article Modeling a satisficing judge, Rationality and Society (2018) (2018)
45. Tacit Collusion – The Neglected Experimental Evidence
    Discussion Paper Series of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods, Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods View citations (14)
    Also in Discussion Paper Series of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods, Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods (2015) View citations (15)
    See also Journal Article Tacit Collusion: The Neglected Experimental Evidence, Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, John Wiley & Sons (2015) View citations (14) (2015)
46. The Jurisdiction of the Man Within – Introspection, Identity, and Cooperation in a Public Good Experiment
    Discussion Paper Series of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods, Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods View citations (2)

2014

47. Can we manage first impressions in cooperation problems? An experiment
    Discussion Paper Series of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods, Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods View citations (15)
48. Conditional Cooperation With Negative Externalities – An Experiment
    Discussion Paper Series of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods, Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods View citations (10)
    See also Journal Article Conditional cooperation with negative externalities – An experiment, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier (2014) View citations (9) (2014)
49. Effort and Redistribution: Better Cousins Than One Might Have Thought
    Discussion Paper Series of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods, Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods
50. Give Everybody a Voice! The Power of Voting in a Public Goods Experiment with Externalities
    Discussion Paper Series of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods, Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods View citations (4)
51. Maverick – Making Sense of a Conjecture of Antitrust Policy in the Lab
    Discussion Paper Series of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods, Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods View citations (5)

2013

52. Behavioral Law and Economics: Empirical Methods
    Discussion Paper Series of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods, Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods View citations (5)
53. Deterrence by Imperfect Sanctions – A Public Good Experiment
    Discussion Paper Series of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods, Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods View citations (2)
54. First Impressions are More Important than Early Intervention Qualifying Broken Windows Theory in the Lab
    Discussion Paper Series of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods, Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods View citations (1)
    See also Journal Article First impressions are more important than early intervention: Qualifying broken windows theory in the lab, International Review of Law and Economics, Elsevier (2014) View citations (18) (2014)
55. Selfishness As a Potential Cause of Crime. A Prison Experiment
    Discussion Paper Series of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods, Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods View citations (2)
56. Symmetric vs. Asymmetric Punishment Regimes for Bribery
    Discussion Paper Series of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods, Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods View citations (22)
57. When is the Risk of Cooperation Worth Taking? The Prisoner’s Dilemma as a Game of Multiple Motives
    Discussion Paper Series of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods, Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods View citations (3)
    See also Journal Article When is the risk of cooperation worth taking? The prisoner’s dilemma as a game of multiple motives, Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals (2016) View citations (10) (2016)
58. Who is Afraid of Pirates? An Experiment on the Deterrence of Innovation by Imitation
    Discussion Paper Series of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods, Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods
    See also Journal Article Who is afraid of pirates? An experiment on the deterrence of innovation by imitation, Research Policy, Elsevier (2015) View citations (8) (2015)
59. Win Shift Lose Stay - An Experimental Test of Non-Compete Clauses
    Jena Economics Research Papers, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena
    Also in Discussion Paper Series of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods, Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods (2013)

2012

60. Assuring Adequate Deterrence in Tort: A Public Good Experiment
    Discussion Paper Series of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods, Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods
61. Estimation of the House Money Effect Using Hurdle Models
    Discussion Paper Series of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods, Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods View citations (6)
62. Low Self-Control As a Source of Crime. A Meta-Study
    Discussion Paper Series of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods, Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods View citations (8)
63. Neglect the Base Rate: It’s the Law!
    Discussion Paper Series of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods, Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods
64. Role Induced Bias in Court: An Experimental Analysis
    Discussion Paper Series of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods, Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods View citations (1)
65. The Hog-Cycle of Law Professors
    Discussion Paper Series of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods, Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods
66. The Tradeoff Between Redistribution and Effort: Evidence from the Field and from the Lab
    CESifo Working Paper Series, CESifo View citations (3)
    Also in IAW Discussion Papers, Institut für Angewandte Wirtschaftsforschung (IAW) (2012) View citations (3)

2011

67. Besonderes Verwaltungsrecht und ökonomische Theorie
    Discussion Paper Series of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods, Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods
68. Dictator Games: A Meta Study
    Discussion Paper Series of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods, Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods View citations (780)
    See also Journal Article Dictator games: a meta study, Experimental Economics, Springer (2011) View citations (761) (2011)
69. Has The World Changed? My Neighbor Might Know Effects of Social Context on Routine Deviation
    Discussion Paper Series of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods, Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods
70. Law as a Precondition for Religious Freedom
    Discussion Paper Series of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods, Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods View citations (1)
71. Oligopoly as a Socially Embedded Dilemma. An Experiment
    Discussion Paper Series of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods, Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods
72. The Coevolution of Behavior and Normative Expectations. Customary Law in the Lab
    Discussion Paper Series of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods, Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods View citations (1)
73. The People’s Hired Guns? Experimentally Testing the Inclination of Prosecutors to Abuse the Vague Definition of Crimes
    Discussion Paper Series of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods, Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods
74. We Are Not Alone: The Impact of Externalities on Public Good Provision
    Discussion Paper Series of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods, Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods View citations (26)

2010

75. An Experimental Contribution to the Revision of the Guidelines on Research and Development Agreements
    Discussion Paper Series of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods, Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods
76. An Experimental Contribution to the Theory of Customary (International) Law
    Discussion Paper Series of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods, Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods
77. At the Mercy of the Prisoner Next Door. Using an Experimental Measure of Selfishness as a Criminological Tool
    Discussion Paper Series of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods, Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods View citations (8)
78. Fairness Ex Ante & Ex Post – An Experimental Test of the German “Bestseller Paragraph”
    Discussion Paper Series of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods, Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods

2009

79. Competition as a Socially Desirable Dilemma. Theory vs. Experimental Evidence
    Discussion Paper Series of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods, Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods
    See also Chapter Competition as a Socially Desirable Dilemma – Theory v. Experimental Evidence, Chapters, Edward Elgar Publishing (2011) (2011)
80. Das schwindende Vertrauen in die Marktwirtschaft und die Folgen für das Recht [The Eroding Trust in Capitalism and its Consequences for Law]
    Discussion Paper Series of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods, Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods
81. On Probation. An Experimental Analysis
    Discussion Paper Series of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods, Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods View citations (2)
    See also Journal Article On Probation: An Experimental Analysis, Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, John Wiley & Sons (2015) (2015)

2008

82. Can We Trust Intuitive Jurors? An Experimental Analysis
    Discussion Paper Series of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods, Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods View citations (9)
83. Preponderance of the Evidence versus Intime Conviction. A Behavioural Perspective on a Conflict between American and Continental European Law
    Discussion Paper Series of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods, Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods View citations (2)
84. The Behaviour of Corporate Actors. A Survey of the Empirical Literature
    Discussion Paper Series of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods, Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods View citations (6)

2007

85. Better Than Conscious? The Brain, the Psyche, Behavior, and Institutions
    Discussion Paper Series of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods, Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods
86. Competition in a Pure World of Internet Telephony
    Discussion Paper Series of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods, Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods
    See also Journal Article Competition in a pure world of Internet telephony, Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier
87. Giving the German Cartel Office the Power of Divestiture. The Conformity of the Reform with Constitutional Law
    Discussion Paper Series of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods, Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods
88. Incentives for Process Innovation in a Collusive Duopoly
    Discussion Paper Series of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods, Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods
89. Institutions for Intuitive Man
    Discussion Paper Series of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods, Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods View citations (2)
90. Intellectual Property as a Carrot for Innovators Using Game Theory to Show the Limits of the Argument
    Discussion Paper Series of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods, Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods

2006

91. Competition as a Socially Desirable Dilemma
    Discussion Paper Series of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods, Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods View citations (1)
92. How Much Collusion. A Meta-Analysis On Oligopoly Experiments
    Discussion Paper Series of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods, Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods View citations (20)
    See also Journal Article HOW MUCH COLLUSION? A META-ANALYSIS OF OLIGOPOLY EXPERIMENTS, Journal of Competition Law and Economics, Oxford University Press (2007) View citations (76) (2007)
93. The Difficult Reception of Rigorous Descriptive Social Science in the Law
    Discussion Paper Series of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods, Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods
94. The Impact of Institutions on the Decision How to Decide
    Discussion Paper Series of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods, Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods View citations (2)
    See also Journal Article The impact of institutions on the decision how to decide, Journal of Institutional Economics, Cambridge University Press (2007) View citations (4) (2007)

2005

95. Corporate Design for Regulability. A Principal-Agent-Supervisor Model
    Discussion Paper Series of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods, Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods
    See also Journal Article Corporate Design for Regulability: A Principal-Agent-Supervisor Model, Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics (JITE), Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen (2006) View citations (3) (2006)
96. Voice over IP. Competition Policy and Regulation
    Discussion Paper Series of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods, Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods View citations (1)
97. Öffentlichkeitsarbeit der Regierung (Governmental Public Relations)
    Discussion Paper Series of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods, Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods

2004

98. Social Dilemmas, Revisited from a Heuristics Perspective
    Discussion Paper Series of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods, Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods View citations (2)

2003

99. Market Definition As a Social Construction (Marktabgrenzung als soziale Konstruktion)
    Discussion Paper Series of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods, Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods

Journal Articles

2024

1. Is transparency a blessing or a curse? An experimental horse race between accountability and extortionary corruption
   International Review of Law and Economics, 2024, 78, (C)
2. Outcomes or participation? Experimentally testing competing sources of legitimacy for taxation
   Economic Inquiry, 2024, 62, (2), 563-583
3. The Law – An Impossible Discipline
   Review of Law & Economics, 2024, 20, (3), 325-340
4. What makes cooperation precarious?
   Journal of Economic Psychology, 2024, 101, (C)

2023

5. Do Not Draw a Black Ball from the Justice Lottery
   Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics (JITE), 2023, 179, (1), 118-120
6. Does the Fundamental Transformation Deter Trade? An Experiment
   American Law and Economics Review, 2023, 25, (1), 338-380
   See also Working Paper Does the Fundamental Transformation Deter Trade? An Experiment, Discussion Paper Series of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods (2020) (2020)
7. Hide and Seek in the Judiciary
   Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics (JITE), 2023, 179, (1), 152-155
8. Judicial Decision-Making
   Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics (JITE), 2023, 179, (1), 1-5

2022

9. Intensified support for juvenile offenders on probation: Evidence from Germany
   Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 2022, 19, (2), 447-490 View citations (2)
10. Lucky you: Your case is heard by a seasoned panel—Panel effects in the German Constitutional Court
    Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 2022, 19, (4), 1179-1221 View citations (3)

2021

11. Managing expectations: How selective information affects cooperation and punishment in social dilemma games
    Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 2021, 187, (C), 111-136 View citations (7)
12. People are conditional rule followers
    Journal of Economic Psychology, 2021, 85, (C) View citations (4)
    See also Working Paper People Are Conditional Rule Followers, Discussion Paper Series of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods (2017) View citations (1) (2017)
13. Social mindfulness is normative when costs are low, but rapidly declines with increases in costs
    Judgment and Decision Making, 2021, 16, (2), 290-322
14. The Impact of Behavioral Economics on the Law: Introduction
    Review of Law & Economics, 2021, 17, (2), 241-251

2020

15. Estimating heterogeneous reactions to experimental treatments
    Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 2020, 178, (C), 124-147 View citations (1)
    See also Working Paper Estimating Heterogeneous Reactions to Experimental Treatments, Discussion Paper Series of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods (2019) (2019)
16. Manna from Heaven for Judges: Judges’ Reaction to a Quasi‐Random Reduction in Caseload
    Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 2020, 17, (4), 722-751 View citations (8)
    See also Working Paper Manna from Heaven for Judges– Judges’ Reaction to a Quasi-Random Reduction in Caseload, Discussion Paper Series of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods (2020) View citations (10) (2020)
17. Tax morale and fairness in conflict an experiment
    Journal of Economic Psychology, 2020, 81, (C) View citations (12)
    See also Working Paper Tax Morale and Fairness in Conflict - An Experiment, Discussion Paper Series of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods (2019) (2019)
18. The Fragility of a Nudge: the power of self-set norms to contain a social dilemma
    Journal of Economic Psychology, 2020, 81, (C) View citations (10)
19. Uncertain Judges
    Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics (JITE), 2020, 176, (1), 44-47

2019

20. Deciding on behalf of others does not mitigate selfishness
    Economics Letters, 2019, 183, (C), - View citations (2)
21. Genome-wide association and transcriptome studies identify target genes and risk loci for breast cancer
    Nature Communications, 2019, 10, (1), 1-18
22. How to deal with inconsistent choices on multiple price lists
    Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 2019, 160, (C), 138-157 View citations (13)
23. When Does Transparency Backfire? Putting Jeremy Bentham's Theory of General Prevention to the Experimental Test
    Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 2019, 16, (4), 881-908

2018

24. Empirical Methods for the Law
    Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics (JITE), 2018, 174, (1), 5-23 View citations (1)
    See also Working Paper Empirical Methods for the Law, Discussion Paper Series of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods (2017) (2017)
25. How to Protect Entitlements: An Experiment
    Journal of Law and Economics, 2018, 61, (3), 525 - 553 View citations (2)
    See also Working Paper How to Protect Entitlements: An Experiment, Discussion Paper Series of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods (2017) (2017)
26. If the worst comes to the worst: Dictator giving when recipient’s endowments are risky
    European Economic Review, 2018, 105, (C), 51-70 View citations (4)
    See also Working Paper If the Worst Comes to the Worst. Dictator Giving When Recipient’s Endowments are Risky, Discussion Paper Series of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods (2015) (2015)
27. Modeling a satisficing judge
    Rationality and Society, 2018, 30, (2), 220-246
    See also Working Paper Modeling a Satisficing Judge, Discussion Paper Series of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods (2015) (2015)

2017

28. At the mercy of a prisoner three dictator experiments
    Applied Economics Letters, 2017, 24, (11), 774-778 View citations (3)
29. The Hidden Cost of Compensation
    Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics (JITE), 2017, 173, (1), 106-109
30. The Remedies Game
    Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics (JITE), 2017, 173, (1), 1-3
31. The dark side of price cap regulation: a laboratory experiment
    Public Choice, 2017, 173, (1), 217-240 View citations (3)
32. You Are in Charge: Experimentally Testing the Motivating Power of Holding a Judicial Office
    The Journal of Legal Studies, 2017, 46, (1), 1 - 50 View citations (13)
    See also Working Paper You Are In Charge – Experimentally Testing the Motivating Power of Holding a Judicial Office, Discussion Paper Series of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods (2016) View citations (1) (2016)

2016

33. A random shock is not random assignment
    Economics Letters, 2016, 145, (C), 45-47 View citations (4)
    See also Working Paper A Random Shock Is Not Random Assignment, Discussion Paper Series of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods (2016) View citations (4) (2016)
34. Bargaining in the Absence of Property Rights: An Experiment
    Journal of Law and Economics, 2016, 59, (2), 477 - 495 View citations (6)
35. Beyond Privity 33rd International Seminar on the New Institutional Economics June 10-13, 2015, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
    Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics (JITE), 2016, 172, (1), 1-4
36. Does Class Action Have a Deterrent Effect?
    Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics (JITE), 2016, 172, (1), 104-107
37. Functional mechanisms underlying pleiotropic risk alleles at the 19p13.1 breast–ovarian cancer susceptibility locus
    Nature Communications, 2016, 7, (1), 1-22 View citations (1)
38. Non-compete clauses, employee effort and spin-off entrepreneurship: A laboratory experiment
    Research Policy, 2016, 45, (10), 2113-2124 View citations (3)
39. Symmetric vs. Asymmetric Punishment Regimes for Collusive Bribery
    American Law and Economics Review, 2016, 18, (2), 506-556 View citations (18)
40. The Hog Cycle of Law Professors: An Econometric Time Series Analysis of the Entry-Level Job Market in Legal Academia
    PLOS ONE, 2016, 11, (7), 1-22
41. Unpacking Negligence Liability: Experimentally Testing the Governance Effect
    Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 2016, 13, (1), 116-152 View citations (5)
42. When is the risk of cooperation worth taking? The prisoner’s dilemma as a game of multiple motives
    Applied Economics Letters, 2016, 23, (16), 1157-1161 View citations (10)
    See also Working Paper When is the Risk of Cooperation Worth Taking? The Prisoner’s Dilemma as a Game of Multiple Motives, Discussion Paper Series of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods (2013) View citations (3) (2013)

2015

43. 32nd International Seminar on the New Institutional Economics Does the Law Deliver? June 11-14, 2014, Regensburg, Germany
    Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics (JITE), 2015, 171, (1), 214-214
44. Does the Law Deliver? 32nd International Seminar on the New Institutional Economics June 11-14, 2014, Regensburg, Germany
    Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics (JITE), 2015, 171, (1), 1-5
45. On Probation: An Experimental Analysis
    Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 2015, 12, (2), 252-288
    See also Working Paper On Probation. An Experimental Analysis, Discussion Paper Series of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods (2009) View citations (2) (2009)
46. Randomized Information about the Law as an Instrument
    Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics (JITE), 2015, 171, (1), 171-175
47. Tacit Collusion: The Neglected Experimental Evidence
    Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 2015, 12, (3), 537-577 View citations (14)
    See also Working Paper Tacit Collusion – The Neglected Experimental Evidence, Discussion Paper Series of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods (2015) View citations (14) (2015)
48. The people's hired guns? Experimentally testing the motivating force of a legal frame
    International Review of Law and Economics, 2015, 43, (C), 67-82 View citations (3)
49. Who is Afraid of the Stick? Experimentally Testing the Deterrent Effect of Sanction Certainty
    Review of Behavioral Economics, 2015, 2, (4), 405-434 View citations (14)
50. Who is afraid of pirates? An experiment on the deterrence of innovation by imitation
    Research Policy, 2015, 44, (1), 20-33 View citations (8)
    See also Working Paper Who is Afraid of Pirates? An Experiment on the Deterrence of Innovation by Imitation, Discussion Paper Series of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods (2013) (2013)

2014

51. 31st International Seminar on the New Institutional Economics What Makes Intervention Legitimate? June 12-15, 2013, Weimar, Germany
    Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics (JITE), 2014, 170, (1), 199-199
52. A Dynamic View on Justification
    Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics (JITE), 2014, 170, (1), 189-192
53. Assuring Civil Damages Adequately Deter: A Public Good Experiment
    Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 2014, 11, (2), 301-349 View citations (8)
54. Conditional cooperation with negative externalities – An experiment
    Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 2014, 108, (C), 252-260 View citations (9)
    See also Working Paper Conditional Cooperation With Negative Externalities – An Experiment, Discussion Paper Series of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods (2014) View citations (10) (2014)
55. First impressions are more important than early intervention: Qualifying broken windows theory in the lab
    International Review of Law and Economics, 2014, 37, (C), 126-136 View citations (18)
    See also Working Paper First Impressions are More Important than Early Intervention Qualifying Broken Windows Theory in the Lab, Discussion Paper Series of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods (2013) View citations (1) (2013)
56. Social preferences can make imperfect sanctions work: Evidence from a public good experiment
    Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 2014, 108, (C), 343-353 View citations (28)
57. What Makes Intervention Legitimate? 31st International Seminar on the New Institutional Economics June 12-15, 2013, Weimar, Germany
    Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics (JITE), 2014, 170, (1), 1-4
58. What does “clean” really mean? The implicit framing of decontextualized experiments
    Economics Letters, 2014, 122, (3), 386-389 View citations (31)
59. dhreg, xtdhreg, and bootdhreg: Commands to implement double-hurdle regression
    Stata Journal, 2014, 14, (4), 778-797 View citations (33)

2013

60. 30th International Seminar on the New Institutional Economics Behavioral Theory of Institutions June 6-9, 2012, Bruges, Belgium
    Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics (JITE), 2013, 169, (1), 197-197
61. Behavioral Theory of Institutions 30th International Seminar on the New Institutional Economics June 6-9, 2012, Bruges, Belgium
    Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics (JITE), 2013, 169, (1), 1-3
62. Can We Trust Intuitive Jurors? Standards of Proof and the Probative Value of Evidence in Coherence‐Based Reasoning
    Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 2013, 10, (2), 230-252 View citations (7)
63. Nudged to Be Consistent
    Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics (JITE), 2013, 169, (1), 45-48
64. The Coevolution of Behavior and Normative Expectations: An Experiment
    American Law and Economics Review, 2013, 15, (2), 578-609 View citations (7)

2012

65. Fair Exclusion
    Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics (JITE), 2012, 168, (1), 171-175
    Also in Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics (JITE), 2012, 168, (1), 171-175 (2012)
66. Testing Contracts 29th International Seminar on the New Institutional Economics June 15-18, 2011, Krakow, Poland
    Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics (JITE), 2012, 168, (1), 1-4 View citations (1)

2011

67. 28th International Seminar on the New Institutional Economics Business-to-Consumer Transactions June 09-12, 2010, Budapest, Hungary
    Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics (JITE), 2011, 167, (1), 172-173
68. Business-to-Consumer Transactions 28th International Seminar on the New Institutional Economics June 09-12, 2010, Budapest
    Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics (JITE), 2011, 167, (1), 1-3
69. Contract as Exposure to Attack
    Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics (JITE), 2011, 167, (1), 72-76
70. Dictator games: a meta study
    Experimental Economics, 2011, 14, (4), 583-610 View citations (761)
    See also Working Paper Dictator Games: A Meta Study, Discussion Paper Series of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods (2011) View citations (780) (2011)
71. Fairness Ex Ante and Ex Post: Experimentally Testing Ex Post Judicial Intervention into Blockbuster Deals
    Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 2011, 8, (4), 682-708 View citations (3)
72. The Emergence of a New Rule of Customary Law: An Experimental Contribution
    Review of Law & Economics, 2011, 7, (3), 767-789 View citations (1)
73. WHEN IS INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY NEEDED AS A CARROT FOR INNOVATORS?
    Journal of Competition Law and Economics, 2011, 7, (2), 277-299 View citations (1)

2010

74. Jurimetrics 27th International Seminar on the New Institutional Economics June 11-13, 2009, Kloster Eberbach, Germany
    Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics (JITE), 2010, 166, (1), 1-4
75. The Multiple Uses of Experimental Evidence in Legal Scholarship
    Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics (JITE), 2010, 166, (1), 199-202 View citations (2)
76. The behaviour of corporate actors: How much can we learn from the experimental literature?
    Journal of Institutional Economics, 2010, 6, (4), 445-475 View citations (20)

2009

77. Editorial Preface
    Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics (JITE), 2009, 165, (1), 1-4
78. Erga Omnes: Why does Public International Law Ignore Privity of Contract. Comment
    Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics (JITE), 2009, 165, (1), 24-28 View citations (1)

2008

79. Editorial Preface
    Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics (JITE), 2008, 164, (1), 1-3
80. Learning the law
    Journal of Institutional Economics, 2008, 4, (3), 275-297 View citations (9)
81. Poor Judicial Performance: When should the Parties Care?. Comment
    Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics (JITE), 2008, 164, (1), 95-98

2007

82. Editorial Preface
    Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics (JITE), 2007, 163, (1), 1-4
83. Exclusionary Bundling and the Effects of a Competitive Fringe. Comment
    Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics (JITE), 2007, 163, (1), 133-137
84. HOW MUCH COLLUSION? A META-ANALYSIS OF OLIGOPOLY EXPERIMENTS
    Journal of Competition Law and Economics, 2007, 3, (4), 491-549 View citations (76)
    See also Working Paper How Much Collusion. A Meta-Analysis On Oligopoly Experiments, Discussion Paper Series of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods (2006) View citations (20) (2006)
85. The Cognitive Effect of a Minimum Wage. Comment
    Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics (JITE), 2007, 163, (1), 52-55
86. The impact of institutions on the decision how to decide
    Journal of Institutional Economics, 2007, 3, (3), 323-349 View citations (4)
    See also Working Paper The Impact of Institutions on the Decision How to Decide, Discussion Paper Series of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods (2006) View citations (2) (2006)

2006

87. Corporate Culture as a Resource for Management. Comment
    Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics (JITE), 2006, 162, (1), 97-100
88. Corporate Design for Regulability: A Principal-Agent-Supervisor Model
    Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics (JITE), 2006, 162, (1), 104-124 View citations (3)
    See also Working Paper Corporate Design for Regulability. A Principal-Agent-Supervisor Model, Discussion Paper Series of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods (2005) (2005)
89. Editorial Preface
    Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics (JITE), 2006, 162, (1), 1-4

2005

90. Editorial Preface
    Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics (JITE), 2005, 161, (2), 191-192
91. General and Specific Rules
    Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics (JITE), 2005, 161, (2), 350-354

2004

92. Give the Journals Back to the Scientists: Comment
    Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics (JITE), 2004, 160, (1), 35-38

2003

93. Editorial Preface
    Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics (JITE), 2003, 159, (1), 1-15

2002

94. Organizing and Designing Markets
    Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics (JITE), 2002, 158, (1), 1-4

2001

95. Delineating the Proper Scope of Government: A Proper Task for a Constitutional Court?
    Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics (JITE), 2001, 157, (1), 187-219
96. Editorial Preface
    Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics (JITE), 2001, 157, (1), 1-2

1994

97. "Effizienter Vertragsbruch" - Eine juristische Antwort
    Homo Oeconomicus, 1994, 11, 143-150

Undated

98. Competition in a pure world of Internet telephony
    Telecommunications Policy, 31, (8-9), 530-540
    See also Working Paper Competition in a Pure World of Internet Telephony, Discussion Paper Series of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods (2007) (2007)

Edited books

2006

1. Heuristics and the Law, vol 1
   MIT Press Books, The MIT Press View citations (18)

Chapters

2011

1. Competition as a Socially Desirable Dilemma – Theory v. Experimental Evidence
   Chapter 13 in Competition Policy and the Economic Approach, 2011
   See also Working Paper Competition as a Socially Desirable Dilemma. Theory vs. Experimental Evidence, Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods (2009) (2009)

1995

2. Legal Experiences of Competition among Institutions
   Palgrave Macmillan