Industrial and Organizational Psychology

2008 - 2025

From Cambridge University Press
Cambridge University Press, UPH, Shaftesbury Road, Cambridge CB2 8BS UK.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Kirk Stebbing ().

Access Statistics for this journal.
Is something missing from the series or not right? See the RePEc data check for the archive and series.

Volume 12, issue 4, 2019

Regulating rude: Tensions between free speech and civility in academic employment pp. 357-375

Lilia M. Cortina, Michael G. Cortina and José M. Cortina

Looking on the bright side: Rewarding civil behavior in academia pp. 376-380

Jennifer G. Manegold, Rebecca A. VanMeter and Wendy J. Casper

Civility and voice: From “civility wars” to constructive engagement pp. 381-384

Ludmila N. Praslova

Repercussions of incivility and hostile expressions in academia: A legal perspective pp. 385-390

Sharona Aharoni-Goldenberg, Aharon Tziner and Dana Barnett

Juggling in heels: The struggle of female professors to balance civility and free speech without suffering from negative student evaluations pp. 391-394

Caitlin M. Lapine and Aditi Rabindra Sachdev

Civility 101: Free speech, social media, and university faculty pp. 395-399

O’Connor, Kimberly W. and Gordon B. Schmidt

Toward a workplace that facilitates civility while encouraging prosocial and remedial voice pp. 400-404

Julie B. Olson-Buchanan, Wendy R. Boswell and Young Eun Lee

Can we select for respect in academe? pp. 405-407

Benjamin M. Walsh, Dana Kabat-Farr, Russell A. Matthews and Benjamin D. Schulte

Unpacking the role of power in incivility pp. 408-411

Caitlin A. Demsky

Civility, anti-racism, and inclusion pp. 412-418

Mindy E. Bergman

Freedom of speech: Friend or foe? An investigation of epistemic violence in academic spaces pp. 419-420

Rebecca Harmata

Regulating individual expressions of faith: A balancing act for organizations pp. 421-424

David A. Beane and Chockalingam Viswesvaran

Combating incivility: I-O can get by with a little help from our friends pp. 425-428

Whitney Botsford Morgan, Ethan P. Waples and Nathan R. Neale

Work: What is it good for? (Absolutely nothing)—a critical theorist’s perspective pp. 429-443

Dennis K. Mumby

Deriving meaning from work is neither new nor bad pp. 444-447

George M. Alliger

What is work good for? A positive organizational psychology perspective pp. 448-450

Jamie A. Gruman and Alan M. Saks

Organizational psychology’s contribution to the evolution of work and its environmental impact pp. 451-453

Jeffrey Olenick and Jacob Bradburn

Not all work is paid work, and perhaps eventually none of it will be pp. 454-455

Steven Toaddy

A critical perspective on “critical organizational scholarship” pp. 456-459

Hannes Zacher

Work: What is it good for? Almost everything! pp. 460-462

Ronald H. Humphrey, Chao Miao and Shanshan Qian

Good work, poor work? We need to go far beyond capitalism to answer this question pp. 463-468

Daniela M. Andrei, Anja Van den Broeck and Sharon K. Parker

Work is a win-win: A labor economics perspective pp. 469-472

Jackson Roatch and Jennifer Acosta

The conundrum of industrial-organizational psychology pp. 473-478

Joel Lefkowitz

What can Marxist theories of capitalism tell us about organizational and occupational behaviors? pp. 479-481

Christopher J. Lake and Kimberly E. Rewinkel

What could critical theory have done to help my father? (Absolutely nothing) pp. 482-486

Ramon J. Aldag

Take this job and shove it … or not: Conflicting forces in post-Fordist work pp. 487-490

Bill Curtis

What’s the gig deal? Examining contemporary work issues in the gig economy pp. 491-494

Traci M. Bricka and Amber N. Schroeder

Beyond explicit communication involved in the critical communication perspective pp. 495-496

Harry L. Kohn

Servants of power redux pp. 497-500

Michael J. Zickar

#I-Os matter—extending I-O research and theory even further into the design and implementation of sexual assault and harassment training: A STEM-based example pp. 501-503

Seterra D. Burleson and Debra A. Major

Volume 12, issue 3, 2019

Revolution or 30-year fad? A role for I-O psychology in Lean management pp. 215-233

William K. Balzer, Michelle H. Brodke, Christopher Kluse and Michael J. Zickar

Lean is above all a human endeavor pp. 234-238

O’Brien, Katharine Ridgway and Jacqueline B. Forman

An ethical role for I-O psychology in Lean management pp. 239-242

Rachel S. Rauvola and Candice L. Thomas

Getting in the game: I-O psychologists as debunkers and testers of business practice pp. 243-246

Sayeedul Islam and Gordon B. Schmidt

Leaning on a hybrid approach: A case for Lean Six Sigma pp. 247-250

Shannon Pierce and Dev Dalal

The need for goal-setting theory and motivation constructs in Lean management pp. 251-254

Gordon B. Schmidt

The salutary role of collective and individual mindfulness in Lean management pp. 255-259

Tao Yang

The challenges of Lean management research and practice in the field of entrepreneurship: The roles of I-O psychology theories and I-O psychologists pp. 260-263

Chao Miao, Shanshan Qian and Ronald H. Humphrey

Linking I-O and Lean: Lessons from high performance work systems pp. 264-266

Mahesh Subramony

Further linking Lean management and I-O psychology: A focus on capacity buffers pp. 267-271

Chelsea A. LeNoble and Lawrence D. Fredendall

Applying Lean to cognitively complex work pp. 272-276

Bill Curtis

Here to stay or go? Connecting turnover research to applied attrition modeling pp. 277-301

Andrew B. Speer, Subhadra Dutta, Menghan Chen and Glenn Trussell

Are all voluntary attritions created equally? Understanding the need to incorporate employee diversity into attrition modeling pp. 302-305

William G. Obenauer

Two messages from the other side of the turnover coin: “Here to stay or go?” and “Should I stay or should I go?” pp. 306-309

Teresa J. Rothausen and Kevin E. Henderson

Disparate treatment and adverse impact in applied attrition modeling pp. 310-313

Christopher M. Castille and Ann-Marie R. Castille

Starting with the basics: Getting turnover rates right pp. 314-319

Kevin C. Stanek

Turnover modeling and event history analysis pp. 320-325

Rodney A. McCloy, Justin D. Purl and Erin S. Banjanovic

Turnover as decisions: How judgment and decision-making (JDM) research can inform turnover modeling pp. 326-329

Don C. Zhang

Big data opportunities for advancing turnover theory: A case for inductive and abductive research pp. 330-333

Sang Eun Woo

The other published literature: Attrition modeling in the U.S. military as a bridge between turnover science and practice pp. 334-337

Dan J. Putka, Rodney A. McCloy, Chad H. Van Iddekinge and Huy Le

Selecting for retention: Understanding turnover prehire pp. 338-341

Carter Gibson, Nick Koenig, Jennifer Griffith and Jay H. Hardy

Bystander as a Band-Aid: How organization leaders as active bystanders can influence culture change pp. 342-344

Caitlin Meyer and Alexandra I. Zelin

Blurred lines: How to approach sexual harassment training when sexual harassment isn’t always about sex pp. 345-349

Kelly M. Hamilton, Megan J. Snoeyink and Larry R. Martinez

Empower the powerless: Practical implications for breaking silence pp. 350-354

Yi-Ren Wang and Youjeong Huh

Assessment and development first requires a deeper understanding of unique categories of senior leaders: A focus on CEOs and C-level executives — ERRATUM pp. 355-355

Nathan J. Hiller and Suzanne J. Peterson

Volume 12, issue 2, 2019

Personality testing and the Americans With Disabilities Act: Cause for concern as normal and abnormal personality models are integrated pp. 119-132

Arturia Melson-Silimon, Alexandra M. Harris, Elizabeth L. Shoenfelt, Joshua D. Miller and Nathan T. Carter

Assessing ideal personalities at work: Is it all just a little bit of history repeating? pp. 133-137

Christopher M. Castille, Ann-Marie R. Castille and Rachel Williamson Smith

Adverse impact as disability discrimination: Illustrating the perils through self-control at work pp. 138-142

Mahima Saxena and Scott B. Morris

Personality assessment for work: Legal, I-O, and clinical perspective pp. 143-150

Stephan Dilchert, Deniz S. Ones and Robert F. Krueger

Personality and the ADA: Ameliorating fairness concerns and maintaining utility pp. 151-156

Manuel F. Gonzalez, John F. Capman, Nicholas R. Martin, Tara McClure Johnson, Evan R. Theys and Anthony S. Boyce

Constructs versus measures in personality and other domains: What distinguishes normal and clinical? pp. 157-162

Brenton M. Wiernik, Marina A. Bornovalova, Stephen E. Stark and Deniz S. Ones

Critically evaluating the use of dark trait measurement in selection pp. 163-166

Sydney L. Reichin, Elizabeth M. Grimaldi and James M. LeBreton

Personality testing and the Americans With Disabilities Act: An applicant/employee perspective pp. 167-171

Rachel Williamson Smith, Anna L. Hulett and Jessica L. Maples-Keller

A clarification of ADA jurisprudence for personality-based selection pp. 172-176

Chase A. Winterberg, Michael A. Tapia, Kimberly S. Nei and Bradley J. Brummel

Tilting at windmills and improving personality assessment practices pp. 177-183

Neil D. Christiansen, Peter A. Fisher, Chet Robie and Stuart Quirk

There is no “ab” in “normal”: Bridging the gap between adaptive and maladaptive personality pp. 184-189

Gerianne van Someren, Alexandra Livesey, Sara Gutierrez and Noma Khabo

General and clinical personality assessment in workplace settings: Lines in the sand or regions on the beach? pp. 190-194

John J. Donahue and Rebecca J. Thompson

Assessment trepidation for FFM personality tests: Much “ADA” about nothing? pp. 195-198

Matthew J. Taylor, Breanna R. Wexler and Stephanie M. Merritt

Zu lieben und zu arbeiten: Was Freud right all along? pp. 199-205

Jeffrey M. Cucina, Theodore L. Hayes and Philip T. Walmsley

Just because it’s dark doesn’t mean that we can’t go there pp. 206-210

P. D. Harms, Dustin Wood and Justin A. DeSimone

Assessment and development first requires a deeper understanding of unique categories of senior leaders: A focus on CEOs and C-level executives pp. 211-214

Nathan J. Hiller and Suzanne J. Peterson

Volume 12, issue 1, 2019

#Ustoo: How I-O psychologists can extend the conversation on sexual harassment and sexual assault through workplace training pp. 1-19

Kelsey Medeiros and Jennifer Griffith

If we build it, will they come? Lack of incentives as barriers to implementing effective sexual harassment training pp. 20-24

Isabel Bilotta, Meghan K. Davenport, Felix Y. Wu and Margaret E. Beier

A missing perspective: Considering survivors in sexual misconduct training pp. 25-29

Lindsay Y. Dhanani, Ryan C. Johnson, Cassandra E. Colton and Taylor K. Hall

When training backfires and what can be done about it pp. 30-33

Logan M. Steele and Joseph A. Vandello

Moving beyond employees: Antitrafficking training as facilitating social change pp. 34-38

Maura J. Mills, Leanne M. Tortez and Robert Blanton

Don’t forget the role of civility interventions in workplace sexual harassment pp. 39-41

Benjamin M. Walsh and Vicki J. Magley

Ending harassment is about changing power structures more than providing training pp. 42-47

Mindy E. Bergman

Evidence-based recommendations for improved design of sexual harassment training pp. 48-51

Erin M. Eatough, Shonna D. Waters and Gabriella R. Kellerman

Incorporating bystander intervention into sexual harassment training pp. 52-57

So Yun Lee, Matthew David Hanson and Ho Kwan Cheung

Teenage workers need sexual harassment training, #TeensToo pp. 58-63

Susan M. Stewart and H. Kristl Davison

Improving the measurement of sexual harassment climate pp. 64-67

Caren Goldberg and Afra Ahmad

Improving sexual harassment training effectiveness with climate interventions pp. 68-72

Melissa B. Gutworth and Matt C. Howard

Actions of little consequence pp. 73-78

Sayeedul Islam, Xu Zhu, Holly Jacobs and Ranjit Nair

Expanding the discourse surrounding sexual harassment: The case for considering experienced and observed hostile sexism, benevolent sexism, and gendered incivility pp. 79-83

Nitya Chawla, Elena M. Wong and Allison S. Gabriel

Improving sexual harassment and sexual assault training effectiveness by aligning training efforts with business strategy pp. 84-88

Zhanna Bagdasarov, Julie Olson-Buchanan and Alexandra E. MacDougall

Sexual harassment training: Often necessary but rarely sufficient pp. 89-92

Elissa L. Perry, Carol T. Kulik, Francis D. Golom and Mateo Cruz

Workplace civility training: An antidote to traditional sexual harassment training pp. 93-95

Mark S. Nagy and Deborah J. Curl-Nagy

Sexual harassment and sexual assault training: Consider the industry pp. 96-99

Juan M. Madera, Lindsey Lee and Mary Dawson

Beyond “checking the box”: Using accountability to promote the effectiveness of sexual misconduct training pp. 100-105

Aditi Rabindra Sachdev, Rebecca Grossman and Lisa A. Burke-Smalley

Reporting sexual harassment: The role of psychological safety climate pp. 106-109

Sarah Singletary Walker, Enrica N. Ruggs, Regina M. Taylor and M. Lance Frazier

Sexual assault prevention and the U.S. Navy: An overview pp. 110-114

Benjamin E. Baran, Monique Clinton-Sherrod and Philip E. Sobeck

Sexual harassment and sexual assault training needs analysis for journalists pp. 115-118

Bradley Brummel, Elana Newman, Bret Arnold and Autumn Slaughter