Industrial and Organizational Psychology

2008 - 2025

From Cambridge University Press
Cambridge University Press, UPH, Shaftesbury Road, Cambridge CB2 8BS UK.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Kirk Stebbing ().

Access Statistics for this journal.
Is something missing from the series or not right? See the RePEc data check for the archive and series.

Volume 1, issue 4, 2008

Stereotypes, Bias, and Personnel Decisions: Strange and Stranger pp. 379-392

Frank J. Landy

Gender Stereotypes Are Alive, Well, and Busy Producing Workplace Discrimination pp. 393-398

Madeline E. Heilman and Alice H. Eagly

Triangulation Across Methodologies: All Signs Point to Persistent Stereotyping and Discrimination in Organizations pp. 399-404

Lisa M. Leslie, Eden B. King, Jill C. Bradley and Michelle R. Hebl

Stereotyping Research and Employment Discrimination: Time to See the Forest for the Trees pp. 405-408

Eugene Borgida, Grace Deason, Anita Kim and Susan T. Fiske

Past the First Encounter: The Role of Stereotypes pp. 409-411

Jennifer L. Wessel and Ann Marie Ryan

Fairly Representing the Stereotyping Literature? pp. 412-414

Leslie Ashburn-Nardo

Main Effects Do Not Discrimination Make pp. 415-416

Cort W. Rudolph and Boris B. Baltes

The Persistence of Stereotypes in the Context of Familiarity pp. 417-419

Douglas C. Maynard and Margaret E. Brooks

Focusing on the Goal of Research pp. 420-422

O’Leary, Brian J. and Carmelo J. Turillo

Studying the Influence of Stereotypes on Personnel Decisions in the Real World pp. 423-425

Jeff W. Johnson and Caroline C. Cochran

The Validity of the Implicit Association Test Is a Scientific Certainty pp. 426-429

Laurie A. Rudman

Landy Is Correct: Stereotyping Can Be Moderated by Individuating the Out-Group and by Being Accountable pp. 430-435

Anthony G. Greenwald

Stereotypes About Stereotype Research pp. 436-438

Paul J. Hanges and Jonathan C. Ziegert

The Challenge of Debiasing Personnel Decisions: Avoiding Both Under- and Overcorrection pp. 439-443

Philip E. Tetlock, Gregory Mitchell and Terry L. Murray

Stereotyping, Implicit Association Theory, and Personnel Decisions: I Guess We Will Just Have to Agree to Disagree pp. 444-453

Frank J. Landy

Transforming Our Models of Learning and Development: Web-Based Instruction as Enabler of Third-Generation Instruction pp. 454-467

Kurt Kraiger

Transforming Our Models of Learning and Development: How Far Do We Go? pp. 468-471

J. Kevin Ford

Third-Generation Instruction: “Tools in the Toolbox” Rather Than the “Latest and Greatest” pp. 472-476

Kenneth G. Brown and Howard Klein

Online Social Context Does Not Imply Social Constructivism: A Case for Clear Operationalization pp. 477-479

Richard N. Landers

Is the “Third-Generation Model” New and Is It the Holy Grail of Adaptive Learning? pp. 480-483

Alan M. Saks and Robert R. Haccoun

Two Heads Are Not Always Better Than One: Defining Parameters for Collaboration in Training pp. 484-486

Amy E. Crook and Margaret E. Beier

Instructors as Facilitators of Learner–Learner Interaction in Third-Generation Learning Environments pp. 487-490

J.B. Arbaugh

If You Build It, Will They Interact? The Importance of the Instructor pp. 491-493

Wendy L. Bedwell and Eduardo Salas

Do Second-Generation Models Have More to Offer? pp. 494-495

Traci Sitzmann and Katherine Ely

The Role of Technology in Enabling Third-Generation Training and Development pp. 496-500

Deborah E. Rupp, Alyssa Mitchell Gibbons and Lori Anderson Snyder

Third-Generation Instructional Models: More About Guiding Development and Design Than Selecting Training Methods pp. 501-507

Kurt Kraiger

Volume 1, issue 3, 2008

Personality Testing and Industrial–Organizational Psychology: Reflections, Progress, and Prospects pp. 272-290

Leaetta M. Hough and Frederick L. Oswald

Lessons Learned in Transitioning Personality Measures From Research to Operational Settings pp. 291-295

Leonard A. White, Mark C. Young, Arwen E. Hunter and Michael G. Rumsey

Protecting the Legal and Appropriate Use of Personality Testing: A Practitioner Perspective pp. 296-298

John W. Jones and David W. Arnold

Practitioner’s View of Personality Testing and Industrial–Organizational Psychology: Practical and Legal Issues pp. 299-302

Gerald V. Barrett

Process Models of Personality and Work Behavior pp. 303-307

Jeff W. Johnson

The Failure of Social Desirability Measures to Capture Applicant Faking Behavior pp. 308-311

Richard L. Griffith and Mitchell H. Peterson

Toward a Better Understanding of the Role of Situations in Linking Personality, Work Behavior, and Job Performance pp. 312-316

Neil D. Christiansen and Robert P. Tett

Let Us Not Become Too Narrow pp. 317-319

Greg L. Stewart

An Argument for Context-Specific Personality Assessments pp. 320-322

Eric D. Heggestad and Heather L. Gordon

Personality Testing and Industrial–Organizational Psychology: A Productive Exchange and Some Future Directions pp. 323-332

Frederick L. Oswald and Leaetta M. Hough

Stubborn Reliance on Intuition and Subjectivity in Employee Selection pp. 333-342

Scott Highhouse

Some New (and Old) Suggestions for Improving Personnel Selection pp. 343-346

Nathan R. Kuncel

Stubborn Reliance on Human Nature in Employee Selection: Statistical Decision Aids Are Evolutionarily Novel pp. 347-351

Stephen M. Colarelli and Matthew Thompson

Intuiting the Selection Context pp. 352-354

Richard Klimoski and Robert G. Jones

Why Is It So Hard to Apply Professional Selection Methods in Business Practice? pp. 355-358

Beata Chorągwicka and Barbara Janta

Managers Also Overrely on Tests pp. 359-360

Scott L. Martin

The Role of Perceptions Versus Reality in Managers’ Choice of Selection Decision Aids pp. 361-363

Jean M. Phillips and Stanley M. Gully

Why Don’t They Learn? pp. 364-366

Cynthia D. Fisher

Interviewer Resistance to Structure pp. 367-369

O’Brien, James

Reliance on Intuition and Faculty Hiring pp. 370-371

Morell E. Mullins and Crista Rogers

That’s Not the Only Problem pp. 372-372

Paul W. Thayer

Facts Are Stubborn Things pp. 373-376

Scott Highhouse

Volume 1, issue 2, 2008

Explaining the Weak Relationship Between Job Performance and Ratings of Job Performance pp. 148-160

Kevin R. Murphy

On the Relationship Between Job Performance and Ratings of Job Performance: What Do We Really Know? pp. 161-166

David J. Woehr

Integrating Traditional Perspectives on Error in Ratings: Capitalizing on Advances in Mixed-Effects Modeling pp. 167-173

Dan J. Putka, Michael Ingerick and Rodney A. McCloy

No New Terrain: Reliability and Construct Validity of Job Performance Ratings pp. 174-179

Deniz S. Ones, Chockalingam Viswesvaran and Frank L. Schmidt

How Managers Think: Why the Mediated Model Makes Sense pp. 180-182

Joseph F. King

When I use a word … pp. 183-184

George P. Hollenbeck

What If We Took Within-Person Performance Variability Seriously? pp. 185-189

Cynthia D. Fisher

Inaccurate Performance Ratings Are a Reflection of Larger Organizational Issues pp. 190-193

Michael M. Harris, Dan Ispas and Greg F. Schmidt

Dynamic Performance and the Performance–Performance Rating Relation pp. 194-196

Jochen Reb and Gary J. Greguras

Perspectives on the Relationship Between Job Performance and Ratings of Job Performance pp. 197-205

Kevin R. Murphy

International Perspectives on the Legal Environment for Selection pp. 206-246

Brett Myors, Filip Lievens, Eveline Schollaert, Greet Van Hoye, Steven F. Cronshaw, Antonio Mladinic, Viviana Rodríguez, Herman Aguinis, Dirk D. Steiner, Florence Rolland, Heinz Schuler, Andreas Frintrup, Ioannis Nikolaou, Maria Tomprou, S. Subramony, Shabu B. Raj, Shay Tzafrir, Peter Bamberger, Marilena Bertolino, Marco Mariani, Franco Fraccaroli, Tomoki Sekiguchi, Betty Onyura, Hyuckseung Yang, Neil Anderson, Arne Evers, Oleksandr Chernyshenko, Paul Englert, Hennie J. Kriek, Tina Joubert, Jesús F. Salgado, Cornelius J. König, Larissa A. Thommen, Aichia Chuang, Handan Kepir Sinangil, Mahmut Bayazit, Mark Cook, Winny Shen and Paul R. Sackett

A Consideration of International Differences in the Legal Context of Selection pp. 247-254

Eric M. Dunleavy, David B. Cohen, Michael G. Aamodt and Patricia Schaeffer

Legal Environment for Selection in the United States pp. 255-257

Arthur Gutman

Legal Environment for Selection in India pp. 258-259

R.K. Premarajan, George C. Thornton and P.K. Padhi

International Perspectives on the Legal Environment for Selection: Romania Case pp. 260-263

Irina Cozma and David Woehr

The Legal Environment for Selection in Russia pp. 264-265

Ludmila Praslova

Broadening International Perspectives on the Legal Environment for Personnel Selection pp. 266-270

Brett Myors, Filip Lievens, Eveline Schollaert, Greet Van Hoye, Steven F. Cronshaw, Antonio Mladinic, Viviana Rodríguez, Herman Aguinis, Dirk D. Steiner, Florence Rolland, Heinz Schuler, Andreas Frintrup, Ioannis Nikolaou, Maria Tomprou, S. Subramony, Shabu B. Raj, Shay Tzafrir, Peter Bamberger, Marilena Bertolino, Marco Mariani, Franco Fraccaroli, Tomoki Sekiguchi, Betty Onyura, Hyuckseung Yang, Neil Anderson, Arne Evers, Oleksandr Chernyshenko, Paul Englert, Hennie J. Kriek, Tina Joubert, Jesús f. Salgado, Cornelius J. König, Larissa A. Thommen, Aichia Chuang, Handan Kepir Sinangil, Mahmut Bayazit, Mark Cook, Winny Shen and Paul R. Sackett

Volume 1, issue 1, 2008

The Meaning of Employee Engagement pp. 3-30

William H. Macey and Benjamin Schneider

Been There, Bottled That: Are State and Behavioral Work Engagement New and Useful Construct “Wines”? pp. 31-35

Daniel A. Newman and David A. Harrison

Conceptual Versus Empirical Distinctions Among Constructs: Implications for Discriminant Validity pp. 36-39

James K. Harter and Frank L. Schmidt

The Meaning and Bleeding of Employee Engagement: How Muddy Is the Water? pp. 40-43

Alan M. Saks

Employee Engagement at the Organizational Level of Analysis pp. 44-47

S. Douglas Pugh and Joerg Dietz

Is Behavioral Engagement a Distinct and Useful Construct? pp. 48-51

Mark A. Griffin, Sharon K. Parker and Andrew Neal

Defining Employee Engagement for Productive Research and Practice pp. 52-55

Reeshad S. Dalal, Bradley J. Brummel, Serena Wee and Lisa L. Thomas

Leveraging Employee Engagement: The Practical Implications pp. 56-59

Rebecca C. Masson, Mark A. Royal, Tom G. Agnew and Saul Fine

Employee Engagement From a Self-Determination Theory Perspective pp. 60-62

John P. Meyer and Maryléne Gagnè

Representations of Trait Engagement: Integration, Additions, and Mechanisms pp. 63-66

Robert R. Hirschfeld and Christopher H. Thomas

The Word Is Out: We Need an Active Performance Concept for Modern Workplaces pp. 67-69

Michael Frese

On the Skilled Aspect of Employee Engagement pp. 70-71

Michael J. Burke

State–Trait Returns! And One Practitioner’s Request pp. 72-73

Richard M. Vosburgh

Enriched Engagement Through Assistance to Systems’ Change: A Proposal pp. 74-75

George B. Graen

Engaged in Engagement: We Are Delighted We Did It pp. 76-83

William H. Macey and Benjamin Schneider

Why Assessment Centers Do Not Work the Way They Are Supposed To pp. 84-97

Charles E. Lance

Making Assessment Centers Work the Way They Are Supposed To pp. 98-104

Ann Howard

Mend It, Don’t End It: An Alternate View of Assessment Center Construct-Related Validity Evidence pp. 105-111

Winfred Arthur, Eric Anthony Day and David J. Woehr

What Does Exercise-Based Assessment Really Mean? pp. 112-115

Filip Lievens

The Construct Validity of the Assessment Center Method and Usefulness of Dimensions as Focal Constructs pp. 116-120

Deborah E. Rupp, George C. Thornton and Alyssa M. Gibbons

A Pragmatic View of Assessment Center Exercises and Dimensions pp. 121-124

Brian S. Connelly, Deniz S. Ones, Anuradha Ramesh and Maynard Goff

It Is Not Yet Time to Dismiss Dimensions in Assessment Centers pp. 125-127

Klaus G. Melchers and Cornelius J. König

Improving Assessment Centers by the Trimodal Concept of Personnel Assessment pp. 128-130

Heinz Schuler

Back to Basics of Test Construction and Scoring pp. 131-133

Michael T. Brannick

Assessment Centers Work, but for Different Reasons pp. 134-136

Joel Moses

Narrow Standards for Efficacy and the Research Playground: Why Either–Or Conclusions Do Not Help pp. 137-139

Robert G. Jones and Richard J. Klimoski

Where Have We Been, How Did We Get There, and Where Shall We Go? pp. 140-146

Charles E. Lance