Industrial and Organizational Psychology
2008 - 2025
From Cambridge University Press Cambridge University Press, UPH, Shaftesbury Road, Cambridge CB2 8BS UK. Bibliographic data for series maintained by Kirk Stebbing (). Access Statistics for this journal.
Is something missing from the series or not right? See the RePEc data check for the archive and series.
Volume 13, issue 4, 2020
- Teaching I-O psychology to undergraduate students: Do we practice what we preach? pp. 443-460

- Lisa M. Kath, Nicholas P. Salter, Peter Bachiochi, Kenneth G. Brown and Mikki Hebl
- Enacting leadership: The reciprocal influence between instructor and student pp. 461-466

- Kathie L. Pelletier
- Providing thoughtful performance feedback in the classroom pp. 467-470

- Ann-Marie R. Castille
- Teaching I-O psychology: Interwoven ethics and integrated examples pp. 471-473

- Justina M. Oliveira
- Walk the talk: Incorporating virtual team research in the classroom pp. 474-478

- Julie B. Olson-Buchanan, Zhanna Sahatjian and Christopher M. Sterling
- Balancing empathy: Can professors have too much? pp. 479-481

- Aditi Rabindra Sachdev, Caitlin M. Lapine and Anmol Sachdeva
- Fostering an inclusive classroom environment with evidence-based approaches pp. 482-486

- Lydia Craig and Lauren Kuykendall
- At the frontier of teaching and practice: Relevant issues for nontraditional undergraduate I-O psychology pp. 487-491

- Chelsea A. LeNoble and Donna L. Roberts
- Including I-O psychology content and principles in classrooms to increase I-O visibility pp. 492-496

- Keaton A. Fletcher, Kimberly A. French, Kate E. Kidwell and Claire E. Burnett
- Applying best practices from industrial-organizational psychology to undergraduate research experiences pp. 497-504

- Sin-Ning Cindy Liu, Stephanie E. V. Brown, Anjelica Mendoza and Mindy Bergman
- Small changes that increase student engagement pp. 505-508

- Thomas A. Stetz
- I-O psychology for everyone: Use of culturally responsive teaching to increase diversity and inclusion in undergraduate classrooms pp. 509-514

- Sandra L. Rogelberg, Karoline Summerville and Enrica N. Ruggs
- Supporting student psychological well-being in the I-O psychology classroom pp. 515-518

- Marissa S. Edwards, Neal M. Ashkanasy and Angela J. Martin
- An open-systems approach to course redesign: Moving beyond the pulpit pp. 519-523

- Mateo Cruz and Frank D. Golom
- Inclusion in the classroom: Contextual antecedents and actionable recommendations pp. 524-527

- Dulce M. Vega, Kristi N. Lavigne and Jasmine L. Abou-Elias
- Teaching I-O psychology for the greater good pp. 528-531

- Anne E. Kato
- Practice what we preach, think how we teach pp. 532-535

- Matthew A. Ng and Kristin Horan
- Radical candor: Creating a feedback culture based on learner care and empowerment pp. 536-539

- Tago L. Mharapara and Nimbus A. Staniland
- The future of learning: Teaching industrial and organizational psychology in all modalities pp. 540-543

- Afra Saeed Ahmad, Steven Zhou and Tom Ayers
- Stressing the importance of mental health in I-O courses pp. 544-547

- Saaid A. Mendoza
- Applying I-O theories in classrooms: An examination from the power perspective pp. 548-554

- Joel Hernandez, Bhindai Mahabir and Ho Kwan Cheung
- Building the Field of Dreams: Pop culture as a means of reaching students pp. 555-558

- Joseph J. Mazzola and Nicholas A. F. Baldwin
- “Selling” I-O psychology to non-I-O psychologists: A perspective on small, medium, and large changes pp. 559-563

- Deborah DiazGranados, Ashley Bamberg, Joseph A. Allen, Roni Reiter-Palmon, Jennifer Lee Gibson and Nastassia M. Savage
- Avoiding assumptions: A simple exercise to create shared vision in the classroom pp. 564-567

- Justin T. Scott
- Teaching for retention: I-O students should not be the shoemaker’s children pp. 568-571

- Paul E. Spector
- Giving better feedback in the classroom pp. 572-576

- Paul E. Levy, Ryan K. Thibodeau and Steven T. Tseng
- Practicing what “we are learning”: Insights and perspectives from graduate student instructors pp. 577-580

- Thomas B. Ayres and Chase A. Winterberg
- Practicing what we preach and serving whom we teach pp. 581-584

- Anna K. Nastasi, Elora Voyles and Kyle J. Page
- Who’s your audience? Expanding I-O teaching to non-I-O students pp. 585-589

- Steven Zhou and Afra S. Ahmad
- Extending the way we educate undergraduate students about I-O psychology: A career services perspective pp. 590-593

- William A. Gentry
- Putting Gen Z first: Educating with a generational mind-set pp. 594-598

- Andrew Pueschel, Ryan C. Johnson and Lindsay Y. Dhanani
- Agility in the workplace: Conceptual analysis, contributing factors, and practical examples pp. 599-609

- Moritz K. H. Petermann and Hannes Zacher
Volume 13, issue 3, 2020
- Prestige and relevance of the scholarly journals: Impressions of SIOP members pp. 273-290

- Scott Highhouse, Michael J. Zickar and Sarah R. Melick
- Is where you are more important than who you are? pp. 291-294

- Alan M. Saks and Jamie A. Gruman
- Pardon my French: On superfluous journal rankings, incentives, and impacts on industrial-organizational psychology publication practices in French business schools pp. 295-306

- Mehmet A. Orhan
- I-O Psychology and management journal prestige in business schools: Do institutional versus individual views differ? pp. 307-311

- In-Sue Oh and Chad H. Van Iddekinge
- Publish or perish, but what about practice? pp. 312-315

- Alicia S. Davis, Sofia S. Van Sickle, Saskia Shirley and Jennifer Feitosa
- I-O psychology’s top journals at the bottom of the TOP ranking: Should we consider openness and transparency when ranking journals? pp. 316-320

- Deborah M. Powell, Jeffrey R. Spence and David J. Stanley
- Prestige does not equal quality: Lack of research quality in high-prestige journals pp. 321-327

- Tine Köhler, Justin A. DeSimone and Jeremy L. Schoen
- The TOP factor: An indicator of quality to complement journal impact factor pp. 328-333

- Sven Kepes, George C. Banks and Sheila K. Keener
- Enabling practical research for the benefit of organizations and society pp. 334-338

- Jennifer L. Geimer, Richard N. Landers and Emily G. Solberg
- The global impact of North American journal prestige: Understanding its effects on faculty life throughout the world pp. 339-344

- Austin Lee Nichols, Sharon Glazer, Andrei Ion and Rana Moukarzel
- Successful aging at work: A process model to guide future research and practice pp. 345-365

- Dorien T. A. M. Kooij, Hannes Zacher, Mo Wang and Jutta Heckhausen
- Who has the option to age successfully at work? Considering nonwork factors pp. 366-368

- Meghan K. Davenport and Margaret E. Beier
- Advancing our understanding of successful aging at work: A socioemotional selectivity theory perspective pp. 369-373

- Marc Cubrich and Alexandra Petruzzelli
- The role of leader-member exchange in successful aging at work pp. 374-376

- Erica Fernandes, John N. Shea, Nicole Rogers, Crystal Smith and Evelyn Rogers
- Putting successful aging into context pp. 377-382

- Gretchen A. Petery, Lucinda J. Iles and Sharon K. Parker
- On the limits of agency for successful aging at work pp. 383-387

- Rachel S. Rauvola and Cort W. Rudolph
- “Midlife crisis” on the road to successful workforce aging pp. 388-394

- Vanessa Burke and Alicia A. Grandey
- This time with feeling: Aging, emotion, motivation, and decision making at work pp. 395-398

- Joseph A. Mikels and Alice F. Stuhlmacher
- Successful aging at work: reflections on alpha, beta, and gamma change for older workers and the 2020 SIOP workforce trends pp. 399-402

- Deborah A. Olson and Kenneth S. Shultz
- What’s age got to do with it? You may be surprised! pp. 403-407

- Kristin Allen, Gerianne van Someren and Sara Gutierrez
- Clarifying multilevel and temporal influences on successful aging at work: An ecological systems perspective pp. 408-412

- Justin Marcus
- How bias thwarts successful aging at work pp. 413-416

- Abby Corrington, Linnea C. Ng, Cassandra N. Phetmisy, Ivy Watson, Felix Y. Wu and Mikki Hebl
- A step forward: from conceptualizing to measuring successful aging at work pp. 417-421

- Stanimira K. Taneva and Georgi P. Yankov
- Successfully aging at work or successfully working while aging? The importance of older workers’ psychological well-being pp. 422-425

- William P. Jimenez
- YouScience: mitigating the skills gap by addressing the gender imbalance in high-demand careers pp. 426-441

- Rodney A. McCloy, Patrick J. Rottinghaus, Chan Jeong Park, Rich Feller and Todd Bloom
Volume 13, issue 2, 2020
- Coffee and controversy: How applied psychology can revitalize sexual harassment and racial discrimination training pp. 117-136

- Theodore L. Hayes, Leah E. Kaylor and Kathleen A. Oltman
- Expanding the footprint of sexual harassment prevention training: A power, credit, and leadership perspective pp. 137-141

- Jennifer A. Griffith and Kelsey E. Medeiros
- Mindfulness complements sexual harassment and racial discrimination training by counteracting implicit gender and race biases pp. 142-146

- Tao Yang
- Why is training the only answer? pp. 147-153

- Theresa R. Hernandez, Mindy E. Bergman and Sin-Ning Cindy Liu
- Observer intervention training—filling an important gap pp. 154-158

- Charu Khanna and Aarti Shyamsunder
- Legal factors shaping workplace harassment training pp. 159-162

- Chase A. Winterberg
- Sexual harassment training: A need to consider cultural differences pp. 163-167

- Vipanchi Mishra and H. Kristl Davison
- Looking beyond training as a solution to workplace sexual harassment and discrimination pp. 168-173

- Jillian Anne Latham
- The model minority but not management material? The importance of anti-bias interventions to promote leadership opportunities for Asian Americans pp. 174-177

- Amanda Mouton, Cody B. Cox and Gregory J. Pool
- Expanding the focus: How considering gender and sexual minority experiences can improve sexual harassment training pp. 178-181

- Marc Cubrich
- Integrating discrimination training with CSR programs pp. 182-185

- Felix George
- Changing the narrative on harassment and discrimination training: Building an organizational culture with healthy professional boundaries pp. 186-190

- Sara Jansen Perry
- One size does not fit all: Taking trainees’ personal characteristics into consideration in sexual harassment and racial discrimination training pp. 191-195

- Tamar Icekson, Aharon Tziner and Liad Bareket-Bojmel
- Together we stand: Ally training for discrimination and harassment reduction pp. 196-199

- Danielle M. Gardner and Jo M. Alanis
- Trainees as consumers? How marketing can revitalize sexual harassment and racial discrimination training pp. 200-204

- Radostina K. Purvanova and Andrew Bryant
- Can harassment and discrimination training be less WEIRD? pp. 205-207

- Lilah I. Donnelly and Shan Ran
- Who else besides (White) women? The need for representation in harassment training pp. 208-212

- Gabrielle C. Danna, Joel Hernandez, Bhindai Mahabir, Dhanisha Nandigama and Ho Kwan Cheung
- Receptivity to sexual harassment and racial discrimination training: You can’t learn what you won’t hear pp. 213-215

- Nicholas Salter and Jenna-Lyn R. Roman
- Coffee and corporate social responsibility: Not as simple as revitalizing training pp. 216-218

- Dominique Burrows, Cassandra N. Phetmisy, Ivy Watson, Ryan L. Brown and Margaret E. Beier
- Rethinking how to manage harassment and discrimination in the workplace pp. 219-224

- Justin B. Keeler, Madison B. Goodman, Kent S. Faught and Kimbra D. Whaley
- A culture of respect: Leader development and preventing destructive behavior pp. 225-229

- David M. Wallace, Celeste Raver Luning, Judith E. Rosenstein, Andrew Ledford and Barbara Cyr-Roman
- Who says what (and how) to whom: A multilevel approach to improving workplace bias training pp. 230-235

- Kevin L. Zabel and Keith L. Zabel
- Expanding how we think about diversity training pp. 236-241

- Ashley N. Robinson, David F. Arena, Alex P. Lindsey and Enrica N. Ruggs
- Landing on the wrong planet: Practical guidance for bridging the gap between I-O psychology and key stakeholders pp. 242-245

- Daroon Jalil, X. Susan Zhu and Alexander Alonso
- Addressing the so-called validity–diversity trade-off: Exploring the practicalities and legal defensibility of Pareto-optimization for reducing adverse impact within personnel selection pp. 246-271

- Deborah E. Rupp, Q. Chelsea Song and Nicole Strah
Volume 13, issue 1, 2020
- Supporting robust, rigorous, and reliable reviewing as the cornerstone of our profession: Introducing a competency framework for peer review pp. 1-27

- Tine Köhler, M. Gloria González-Morales, George C. Banks, O’Boyle, Ernest H., Joseph A. Allen, Ruchi Sinha, Sang Eun Woo and Lisa M. V. Gulick
- Using results-blind reviewing to support the peer review competency framework pp. 28-31

- Liana Kreamer and Steven G. Rogelberg
- An empirical exploration of reviewers’ and editors’ roles fostering high quality research during peer review pp. 32-36

- Roxanne Ross and Eric D. Heggestad
- Reviewing is its own reward … but should it be? Incentivizing peer review pp. 37-40

- Lauren Collier-Spruel
- Lack of expertise means it is not a peer review pp. 41-44

- Jeremy L. Schoen
- Should you sign your reviews? Open peer review and review quality pp. 45-47

- Don C. Zhang, Rachel Williamson Smith and Sheryl Lobo
- Peer review and role conflict pp. 48-50

- Alex de Voogt and J. Malte Runge
- Bringing the review process into the 21st century: Post-publication peer review pp. 51-53

- P. D. Harms and Marcus Credé
- In our English-only research world, there is a need for reviewers who are tolerant of imperfect texts from non-anglophone authors pp. 54-56

- Cornelius J. König and Nida ul Habib Bajwa
- Context matters: Developing peer reviewers to advance science and practice pp. 57-60

- Kristin Allen, Jennifer L. Geimer and Eric Popp
- Quality standards and training are important in the peer review process, but what about engagement? pp. 61-63

- Peter J. Jordan
- About competencies and situations: A trait-activation approach to the competency framework for peer review pp. 64-67

- Joeri Hofmans, Tim Vantilborgh and Sara De Gieter
- Split roles in peer reviewing pp. 68-71

- Paul E. Spector
- Navigating the review process through the holier than thou pp. 72-75

- Jeffrey B. Vancouver
- Methodological checklists for improving research quality and reporting consistency pp. 76-83

- Lillian T. Eby, Kristen M. Shockley, Talya N. Bauer, Bryan Edwards, Astrid C. Homan, Russell Johnson, Jonas W. B. Lang, Scott B. Morris and Frederick L. Oswald
- Recommendation: Add a competency on diversity and inclusion pp. 84-89

- Sin-Ning Cindy Liu, Mindy E. Bergman and Theresa R. Hernandez
- Leadership concepts in manufacturing environments: A brief historical review and conclusion with recommendations for education and training of I-O psychologists pp. 90-102

- Karen A. Tinker-Walker and Jimmy D. Walker
- Is the future of leadership development wearable? Exploring self-tracking in leadership programs pp. 103-116

- Marian N. Ruderman and Cathleen Clerkin
| |