Industrial and Organizational Psychology

2008 - 2025

From Cambridge University Press
Cambridge University Press, UPH, Shaftesbury Road, Cambridge CB2 8BS UK.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Kirk Stebbing ().

Access Statistics for this journal.
Is something missing from the series or not right? See the RePEc data check for the archive and series.

Volume 9, issue 4, 2016

From the Editor pp. 691-692

John C. Scott and Mark Poteet

Qualitative Research in I-O Psychology: Maps, Myths, and Moving Forward pp. 693-715

Michael G. Pratt and Silvia Bonaccio

Qualitative Researchers, Heal (and Help) Thyself Too pp. 716-719

Michael J. Zickar

Why I-O Journals Do Not Publish Qualitative Work pp. 720-726

Mark Fichman

Journal Guidelines for Qualitative Research? A Balancing Act That Might Be Worth It pp. 726-732

Annika Wilhelmy

Additional Suggestions for Breaking Barriers Against Qualitative Research in I-O pp. 732-735

David M. Fisher and Anupama Narayan

Understanding Deep, Socially Embedded Human Motivations and Aspirations for Work From Whole Person and Interdisciplinary Perspectives pp. 735-739

Teresa J. Rothausen

Taking Qualitative Methods a Step Further to Team Science pp. 739-743

Lorena Solis, Theresa Aristomene, Jennifer Feitosa and Ebony Smith

Qualitative I-O Psychology: A View From Europe pp. 744-747

Gillian Symon and Catherine Cassell

Integrating Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Doctoral Education: A Case Study pp. 748-753

Robert M. Bickmeier, Steven G. Rogelberg and Gregory C. Berka

It's Like Doing a Job Analysis: You Know More About Qualitative Methods Than You May Think pp. 753-760

Alice M. Brawley and Cynthia L. S. Pury

The Evolution and Devolution of 360° Feedback pp. 761-794

David W. Bracken, Dale S. Rose and Allan H. Church

Don't Give Up on the Self Too Quickly pp. 795-799

Scott N. Taylor

Comparing Rater Groups: How To Disentangle Rating Reliability From Construct-Level Disagreements pp. 800-806

Chockalingam Viswesvaran, Deniz S. Ones and Frank L. Schmidt

Why the Qualms With Qualitative? Utilizing Qualitative Methods in 360° Feedback pp. 806-810

Adam Kabins

Holding Leaders Accountable During the 360° Feedback Process pp. 811-813

Stephen F. Young, William A. Gentry and Phillip W. Braddy

I-O Practice in Action: Solving the Leadership Potential Identification Challenge in Organizations pp. 814-830

Rob Silzer, Allan H. Church, Christopher T. Rotolo and John C. Scott

Volume 9, issue 3, 2016

From the Editor pp. 523-524

John C. Scott

Baltimore Is Burning: Can I-O Psychologists Help Extinguish the Flames? pp. 525-547

Enrica N. Ruggs, Michelle R. Hebl, Verónica Caridad Rabelo, Kayla B. Weaver, Joy Kovacs and Andeneshea S. Kemp

A Force for Law and Order pp. 548-550

James S. Herndon

Broadening the Lens of Stereotype and Bias: Perspectives From Charm City pp. 550-557

Sally D. Farley and Rebecca J. Thompson

A Plea for Bystander Intervention pp. 558-561

Derek R. Avery

The Criticality of a Community Perspective pp. 561-564

Rebecca S. Hardin

Approaching “Baltimore Is Burning” From a Systems Change Perspective: Role of I-O Psychologists as Change Agents pp. 565-572

Chatterjee, Deepshikha (Dia)

Community-Oriented Policing: Hiring in the Spirit of Service pp. 573-582

Leaetta M. Hough

Alignment Between Antecedents and Interventions: The Critical Role of Implicit Bias pp. 583-590

Kathleen A. Tomlin and Jill C. Bradley-Geist

A Simple Solution to Policing Problems: Women! pp. 590-597

Mindy E. Bergman, Jessica M. Walker and Vanessa A. Jean

An Exercise in Fire Safety: Readying Ourselves for the Unintended Consequences of Traditional I-O Approaches to Diversity Management pp. 598-604

Alison V. Hall

Theoretical Applications of the MODE Model to Law Enforcement Training and Interventions pp. 604-611

Keith L. Zabel, Kevin L. Zabel, Michael A. Olson and Jessica H. Carlson

Additional Ideas for Putting Out the Flames pp. 611-620

Rick Jacobs, Jean Phillips and Stan Gully

New Talent Signals: Shiny New Objects or a Brave New World? pp. 621-640

Tomas Chamorro-Premuzic, Dave Winsborough, Ryne A. Sherman and Robert Hogan

In Defense of Practical Theory pp. 641-645

Seymour Adler and Anthony S. Boyce

Are We on the Same Wavelength? Four Steps for Moving From Talent Signals to Valid Talent Management Applications pp. 645-654

Allan H. Church and Rob Silzer

Meet You at the Peak: How I-Os Should Prepare for New Technologies pp. 655-660

Kathy Tuzinski and Tracy Kantrowitz

Reducing the Noise From Scraping Social Media Content: Some Evidence-Based Recommendations pp. 660-666

Filip Lievens and Chad H. Van Iddekinge

Don't Forget To Properly Use Your Signal: Driving Down New Roads to Selection Decisions pp. 666-671

Ryan G. Horn, Samuel E. Kaminsky and Tara S. Behrend

Correcting Misconceptions About Gamification of Assessment: More Than SJTs and Badges pp. 671-677

Michael B. Armstrong, Jared Z. Ferrell, Andrew B. Collmus and Richard N. Landers

Moving Beyond Identification: Using Gamification To Attract and Retain Talent pp. 677-682

Graham H. Lowman

Legal Trends in Organizational Online Social Media Use pp. 682-689

Amber N. Schroeder and Cameron R. Lile

Volume 9, issue 2, 2016

From the Editor pp. 217-218

John C. Scott

Getting Rid of Performance Ratings: Genius or Folly? A Debate pp. 219-252

Seymour Adler, Michael Campion, Alan Colquitt, Amy Grubb, Kevin Murphy, Rob Ollander-Krane and Elaine D. Pulakos

Aligning Research and the Current Practice of Performance Management pp. 253-260

Gerald E. Ledford, George Benson and Edward E. Lawler

Feedback Dynamics Are Critical to Improving Performance Management Systems pp. 260-266

Nitya Chawla, Allison S. Gabriel, Jason J. Dahling and Kajal Patel

How Will Getting Rid of Performance Ratings Affect Managers? pp. 266-270

Christopher J. Lake and Alexandra Luong

Efficiency Ratings and Performance Appraisals in the United States Federal Government pp. 270-275

Thomas A. Stetz and Todd L. Chmielewski

Why Performance Appraisal Does Not Lead to Performance Improvement: Excellent Performance as a Function of Uniqueness Instead of Uniformity pp. 275-281

Marianne van Woerkom and Maaike de Bruijn

Genius or Folly? It Depends on Whether Performance Ratings Survive the “Psychological Immune System” pp. 281-288

Lukas Neville and Nicolas Roulin

Working With Social Comparisons in the Appraisal and Management of Performance pp. 288-296

R. Blake Jelley

Rating Performance May Be Difficult, but It Is Also Necessary pp. 296-304

Steven T. Hunt

Use the Best; Leave the Rest: The Productivity Measurement and Enhancement System (ProMES) for Performance Ratings pp. 305-309

Daniel Schmerling and Anne Scaduto

Ratee Reactions Drive Performance Appraisal Success (and Failure) pp. 310-314

Lauren E. Wallace, Samantha A. Stelman and Dorey S. Chaffee

Time To Change the Bathwater: Correcting Misconceptions About Performance Ratings pp. 314-322

C. Allen Gorman, Christopher J. L. Cunningham, Shawn M. Bergman and John P. Meriac

Beyond Performance Ratings: The Long Road to Effective Performance Management pp. 322-328

Robert L. Cardy and Deeksha Munjal

Construct Validity Evidence for Multisource Performance Ratings: Is Interrater Reliability Enough? pp. 329-333

Jisoo Ock

The Future of Performance Ratings: Collected Thoughts From Six Emerging Scholars pp. 334-337

Andrew M. Bleckman, Sarah N. Guarino, Wesley Russell, Eileen C. Toomey, Paul M. Werth, Victoria L. Whitaker and Cort W. Rudolph

Performance Management: Embracing Complexity, Evading Reductionism, and Moving to Outcome-Based Approaches pp. 338-341

Shonna D. Waters, Wayne A. Baughman and David W. Dorsey

Eliminating a Quantitative Measure of Performance Means Our Science Is Starting From Square One pp. 342-343

Gabriela Burlacu

Other Important Questions: When, How, and Why Do Cultural Values Influence Performance Management? pp. 343-350

Inchul Cho and Stephanie C. Payne

Disappointing Interventions and Weak Criteria: Carving Out a Solution Is Still Possible pp. 350-356

Aharon Tziner and Sylvia G. Roch

Of Babies and Bathwater: Don't Throw the Measure Out With the Application pp. 357-361

David J. Woehr and Sylvia G. Roch

The Relationship Between the Number of Raters and the Validity of Performance Ratings pp. 361-367

Matt C. Howard

Getting Rid of Performance Ratings pp. 367-370

Melvin Sorcher

Performance Appraisal in a Constantly Changing Work World pp. 370-377

Edna Rabenu and Aharon Tziner

How Much Do We Really Know About Employee Resilience? pp. 378-404

Thomas W. Britt, Winny Shen, Robert R. Sinclair, Matthew R. Grossman and David M. Klieger

The Untapped Potential in Employee Resilience: Specific Recommendations for Research and Practice pp. 405-411

Danielle D. King

Emotion Regulation and Resilience: Overlooked Connections pp. 411-415

Sophie A. Kay

The Role of Self-Regulation in Workplace Resiliency pp. 416-421

Mitchell G. Rothstein, Matthew J. W. McLarnon and Gillian King

Resilience: Distinct Construct or Conglomerate of Existing Traits? pp. 422-429

Gerard J. Fogarty and Harsha N. Perera

(Mis)Steps for Attracting High Resilience Workers pp. 429-435

Kevin J. Eschleman and Chris W. Wright

Bouncing Back to the Future: A Look at the Road Ahead for the Assessment of Resilience pp. 436-442

P. D. Harms and Dustin Wood

How Much Do We Really Know About Employee Resilience? More, If We Include the Sport Psychology Resilience Research pp. 442-446

Elizabeth L. Shoenfelt

Exploring Workplace Resilience Through a Personality Strength Lens pp. 447-452

Jennifer P. Green, David M. Wallace and Amber K. Hargrove

Advancing Employee Resilience Research: Additional Thoughts pp. 452-456

Natalie E. Wolfson and Casey Mulqueen

Resilient Employees in Resilient Organizations: Flourishing Beyond Adversity pp. 456-462

Joana R. C. Kuntz, Katharina Näswall and Sanna Malinen

Integrating Multiple Perspectives Into the Study of Resilience pp. 462-466

Samantha C. January

Extending the Conversation: Employee Resilience at the Team Level pp. 466-475

Deanna M. Kennedy, Lauren Blackwell Landon and M. Travis Maynard

Resilience Practices pp. 475-479

Paul R. Yost

Employee Resilience: A Faceted Analytical Approach pp. 480-485

Edna Rabenu and Aharon Tziner

Opponent Process Theory Can Help Explain Some Effects of Resilience pp. 486-490

Nathan A. Bowling and Terry A. Beehr

Looking Backward, Moving Forward: Exploring Theoretical Foundations for Understanding Employee Resilience pp. 491-497

Kate M. Conley, Malissa A. Clark, Olivia H. Vande Griek and Jay A. Mancini

Elaborating on the Conceptual Underpinnings of Resilience pp. 497-502

Armando X. Estrada, Jamie B. Severt and Miliani Jiménez-Rodríguez

Profiles as a Way of Learning More About Resilience pp. 503-508

Thomas E. Becker and Diane L. Ferry

A Nonlinear Paradigm for Resilience, Workload, Performance, and Clinical Phenomena pp. 509-516

Stephen J. Guastello

Taking Time Seriously as a Component of Employee Resilience pp. 517-522

David K. Palmer

Volume 9, issue 1, 2016

From the Editor pp. 1-2

John C. Scott

Situational Judgment Tests: From Measures of Situational Judgment to Measures of General Domain Knowledge pp. 3-22

Filip Lievens and Stephan J. Motowidlo

In Defense of the Situation: An Interactionist Explanation for Performance on Situational Judgment Tests pp. 23-28

Alexandra M. Harris, Lane E. Siedor, Yi Fan, Benjamin Listyg and Nathan T. Carter

Why Situational Judgment Is a Missing Component in the Theory of SJTs pp. 29-34

Klaus G. Melchers and Martin Kleinmann

Clearly Defined Constructs and Specific Situations Are the Currency of SJTs pp. 34-38

Lijun Chen, Jinyan Fan, Lu Zheng and Elissa Hack

Reinvigorating the Concept of a Situation in Situational Judgment Tests pp. 38-42

Nicolas A. Brown, Ashley Bell Jones, David G. Serfass and Ryne A. Sherman

Both General Domain Knowledge and Situation Assessment Are Needed To Better Understand How SJTs Work pp. 43-47

Jinyan Fan, Melissa Stuhlman, Lijun Chen and Qingxiong Weng

The “Hot Mess” of Situational Judgment Test Construct Validity and Other Issues pp. 47-51

Michael A. McDaniel, Sheila K. List and Sven Kepes

It's Time To Examine the Nomological Net of Job Knowledge pp. 51-55

W. Jackeline Torres and Margaret E. Beier

Further Considerations in SJT Development pp. 55-59

Matthew J. Borneman

Unintended Consequences: Narrowing SJT Usage and Losing Credibility With Applicants pp. 59-63

Amy E. Crook

Scoring SJTs for Traits and Situational Effectiveness pp. 63-71

Robert J. Harvey

Why Some Situational Judgment Tests Fail To Predict Job Performance (and Others Succeed) pp. 71-77

Deborah L. Whetzel and Matthew C. Reeder

SJTs as Measures of General Domain Knowledge for Multimedia Formats: Do Actions Speak Louder Than Words? pp. 77-83

Bobby Naemi, Michelle Martin-Raugh and Harrison Kell

Where Have All the “Workers” Gone? A Critical Analysis of the Unrepresentativeness of Our Samples Relative to the Labor Market in the Industrial–Organizational Psychology Literature pp. 84-113

Mindy E. Bergman and Vanessa A. Jean

Who Are These Workers, Anyway? pp. 114-121

Tracy L. Griggs, Lillian T. Eby, Cynthia K. Maupin, Kate M. Conley, Rachel L. Williamson, Olivia H. Vande Griek and Muriel G. Clauson

How Journals Can Facilitate the Study of Underlying Situational Characteristics Distinguishing Worker and Professional Samples pp. 121-129

Jennifer P. Green and Reeshad S. Dalal

What Else Are We Missing? Additional Issues Associated With Sample Misrepresentation pp. 129-137

Justin A. DeSimone

News Flash! Work Psychology Discovers Workers! pp. 137-144

Joel Lefkowitz

Where in the World Are the Workers? Cultural Underrepresentation in I-O Research pp. 144-152

Christopher G. Myers

Identifying New Organizational Practices by Considering Different Perspectives: An Ethics Management Example pp. 152-157

Johnathan K. Nelson and Sydney M. Gebka

The Rise of the “Gig Economy” and Implications for Understanding Work and Workers pp. 157-162

Kristine M. Kuhn

Is Mechanical Turk the Answer to Our Sampling Woes? pp. 162-167

Melissa G. Keith and Peter D. Harms

Examining Worker Underrepresentation in Selection Research: The Domain Matters pp. 167-174

Allen H. Huffcutt and Satoris S. Culbertson

View From the Trenches: Practitioners’ Perspectives on Key Issues and Opportunities in Low-Wage and Frontline Jobs pp. 174-181

Michael Sliter, Brent Holland, Katherine Sliter and Morgan Jones

We Found Them! The Practitioner Role in Expanding the Generalizability of Findings in I-O Psychology pp. 181-187

Adam S. Beatty and Philip T. Walmsley

Answer: They're Everywhere and We Know Quite a Bit About Them pp. 188-193

Adam J. Vanhove

Sample Adequacy and Implications for Occupational Health Psychology Research pp. 193-197

Jesse S. Michel, Paige Hartman, Sadie K. O'Neill, Anna Lorys and Peter Y. Chen

I-O at a Crossroad: The Value of an Intersectional Research Approach pp. 197-206

Kayla Weaver, Matthew P. Crayne and Kisha S. Jones

The Importance of Sample Composition Depends on the Research Question pp. 207-211

Michael A. Gillespie, Jennifer Z. Gillespie, Michelle H. Brodke and William K. Balzer

Commentary on Ree, Carretta, and Teachout (2015) pp. 211-211

Anonymous

I've Found It, but What Does It Mean? On the Importance of Theory in Identifying Dominant General Factors pp. 212-216

Zhenyu Yuan