Industrial and Organizational Psychology

2008 - 2025

From Cambridge University Press
Cambridge University Press, UPH, Shaftesbury Road, Cambridge CB2 8BS UK.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Kirk Stebbing ().

Access Statistics for this journal.
Is something missing from the series or not right? See the RePEc data check for the archive and series.

Volume 3, issue 4, 2010

What If Industrial–Organizational Psychology Decided to Take Workplace Decisions Seriously? pp. 386-405

Reeshad S. Dalal, Silvia Bonaccio, Scott Highhouse, Daniel R. Ilgen, Susan Mohammed and Jerel E. Slaughter

IOOB Already Takes JDM Seriously, but Is It Reciprocated? pp. 406-410

Theodore L. Hayes and Jessica D. Wooldridge

The Trouble With JDM: Some Limitations to the Influence of JDM on Organizational Research pp. 411-416

Barry M. Staw

Normative Models for Strategic Decision Making in Industrial–Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior pp. 417-420

William P. Bottom and Dejun Tony Kong

Why Has There Been So Much JDM–IOOB Cross-Fertilization? pp. 421-423

Glen Whyte

The Lens Model: An Application of JDM Methodologies to IOOB Practice pp. 424-428

Dev K. Dalal, Dalia L. Diab, William K. Balzer and Michael E. Doherty

Business Forecasters Can Gain From the Cross-Fertilization of IOOB and JDM pp. 429-430

Paul Goodwin

The Role of Creativity in JDM pp. 431-433

Roni Reiter-Palmon and Brad Hullsiek

Can Managers Be Trained to Make Better Decisions? pp. 434-437

Kristine M. Kuhn

How Experts Make Decisions: Beyond the JDM Paradigm pp. 438-442

Michael A. Rosen, Marissa Shuffler and Eduardo Salas

Assessment Centers Are an Excellent Way of Studying Decision Making pp. 443-444

William C. Byham

Integrating IOOB and JDM Through Process-Oriented Research pp. 445-447

Jochen Reb

Studying Personnel and Organizational Judgments as Judgments Requires Training pp. 448-451

Kenneth E. Sumner, Jennifer Bragger, Edwin Om and Daniel Malandruccolo

What If We Took Researchers' Workplace Decisions Seriously? Mundane Incentives Versus Intellectual Merit in the Selection of Research Topics pp. 452-454

Terry Connolly

Taking Workplace Decisions Seriously: This Conversation Has Been Fruitful! pp. 455-464

Silvia Bonaccio, Reeshad S. Dalal, Scott Highhouse, Daniel R. Ilgen, Susan Mohammed and Jerel E. Slaughter

75 Years After Likert: Thurstone Was Right! pp. 465-476

Fritz Drasgow, Oleksandr S. Chernyshenko and Stephen Stark

Questionable Defeats and Discounted Victories for Likert Rating Scales pp. 477-480

Christopher J. Waples, William S. Weyhrauch, Angela R. Connell and Satoris S. Culbertson

Developing and Scaling Personality Measures: Thurstone Was Right—But So Far, Likert Was Not Wrong pp. 481-484

Frederick L. Oswald and Kraig L. Schell

Thurstone Might Have Been Right About Attitudes, but Drasgow, Chernyshenko, and Stark Fail to Make the Case for Personality pp. 485-488

Steven Paul Reise

Issues That Should Not Be Overlooked in the Dominance Versus Ideal Point Controversy pp. 489-493

Anna Brown and Alberto Maydeu-Olivares

Two Caveats for the Use of Ideal Point Items: Discrepancies and Bivariate Constructs pp. 494-497

Marcus Credé

Six Questions That Practitioners (Might) Have About Ideal Point Response Process Items pp. 498-501

Dev K. Dalal, Scott Withrow, Robert E. Gibby and Michael J. Zickar

If Thurstone Was Right, What Happens When We Factor Analyze Likert Scales? pp. 502-503

Paul E. Spector and Michael T. Brannick

Cognitive Processes Related to Forced-Choice, Ideal Point Responses: Drasgow, Chernyshenko, and Stark Got It Right! pp. 504-506

Walter C. Borman

The Ideal Point Model in Action: How the Use of Computer Adaptive Personality Scales Benefits Organizations pp. 507-510

Tracy M. Kantrowitz and Kathy A. Tuzinski

Toward Understanding the Psychology of Unfolding pp. 511-514

Nathan T. Carter, Christopher J. Lake and Michael J. Zickar

Improving the Measurement of Psychological Variables: Ideal Point Models Rock! pp. 515-520

Fritz Drasgow, Oleksandr S. Chernyshenko and Stephen Stark

Volume 3, issue 3, 2010

Organizational Psychology and the Tipping Point of Professional Identity1 pp. 241-258

Ann Marie Ryan and J. Kevin Ford

Who Are We Without the I, or the O, or the P? pp. 259-261

Deirdre J. Knapp

You Lost Me at Hello: Aren't We I-O Psychologists Still? pp. 262-265

Christopher J. L. Cunningham

Professional Identity: Organizational Psychologists as Chief Human Resource Executives pp. 266-268

Marcia Avedon and Karen Grabow

A Means Not an End pp. 269-271

Paul M. Muchinsky

A View Into the Future of Organizational Psychology: Our Experiences With an Interdisciplinary Approach to Graduate Education pp. 272-276

Linda Rhoades Shanock, Steven G. Rogelberg and Eric D. Heggestad

What's in a Name? Just the Essence of One's Professional Identity pp. 277-280

Jonathan Pinto and Patrick Stacey

The Fifth Scenario: Identity Expansion in Organizational Psychology pp. 281-285

David P. Costanza and Jaclyn M. Jensen

Strengthening Shared Identity in I-O Psychology Through Online Social Networks pp. 286-288

Gordon B. Schmidt and Richard N. Landers

A Sense of Identity Does Matter in Achieving Relevance and Meaning in Our Work pp. 289-292

Thomas A. Wright

Industrial-Organizational Psychology's Recurring Identity Crises: It's a Values Issue! pp. 293-299

Joel Lefkowitz

A Profession Awry or Poised for the Future? Work Psychology and Professional Identity pp. 300-304

Ann Marie Ryan and J. Kevin Ford

Validation Is Like Motor Oil: Synthetic Is Better pp. 305-328

Jeff W. Johnson, Piers Steel, Charles A. Scherbaum, Calvin C. Hoffman, P. Richard Jeanneret and Jeff Foster

Validity in a Jiffy: How Synthetic Validation Contributes to Personnel Selection pp. 329-334

Frederick L. Oswald and Leaetta M. Hough

Let's Focus on Two-Stage Alignment Not Just on Overall Performance pp. 335-339

Dave Bartram, Peter Warr and Anna Brown

Better at What? pp. 340-343

Craig J. Russell

Can Synthetic Validity Methods Achieve Discriminant Validity? pp. 344-350

Frank L. Schmidt and In-Sue Oh

Motor Oil or Snake Oil: Synthetic Validity Is a Tool Not a Panacea pp. 351-355

Robert J. Harvey

Synthetic Validity: A Great Idea Whose Time Never Came pp. 356-359

Kevin R. Murphy

Improving I-O Science Through Synthetic Validity pp. 360-362

Jeffrey B. Vancouver

Synthetic Oil Is Better for Whom? pp. 363-365

Lewis Hollweg

Developing an Online Synthetic Validation Tool pp. 366-370

Rodney A. McCloy, Dan J. Putka and Robert E. Gibby

At Sea With Synthetic Validity pp. 371-383

Piers Steel, Jeff W. Johnson, P. Richard Jeanneret, Charles A. Scherbaum, Calvin C. Hoffman and Jeff Foster

Erratum pp. 384-384

Anonymous

Volume 3, issue 2, 2010

Emotional Intelligence: Toward Clarification of a Concept pp. 110-126

Cary Cherniss

Taking the “Intelligence” in Emotional Intelligence Seriously pp. 127-130

Stéphane Côté

On a Nomenclature for Emotional Intelligence Research pp. 131-135

Gilles E. Gignac

Trait Emotional Intelligence Theory pp. 136-139

K.V. Petrides

Emotional Intelligence: Muddling Through Theory and Measurement pp. 140-144

Richard Roberts, Gerald Matthews and Moshe Zeidner

A Call to Context pp. 145-148

Peter J. Jordan, Marie T. Dasborough, Catherine S. Daus and Neal M. Ashkanasy

Emotional Intelligence: Additional Questions Still Unanswered pp. 149-153

David L. Van Rooy, Daniel S. Whitman and Chockalingam Viswesvaran

Remaining Issues in Emotional Intelligence Research: Construct Overlap, Method Artifacts, and Lack of Incremental Validity pp. 154-158

P.D. Harms and Marcus Credé

Emotional Intelligence and Job Performance: The Importance of Emotion Regulation and Emotional Labor Context pp. 159-164

Daniel A. Newman, Dana L. Joseph and Carolyn MacCann

Emotional Intelligence: On Definitions, Neuroscience, and Marshmallows pp. 165-170

John Antonakis and Joerg Dietz

Oops…. We Did It Again: Industrial–Organizational's Focus on Emotional Intelligence Instead of on Its Relationships to Work Outcomes pp. 171-177

Seth Kaplan, José Cortina and Gregory A. Ruark

Before Emotional Intelligence: Research on Nonverbal, Emotional, and Social Competences pp. 178-182

Ronald E. Riggio

Emotional Intelligence: New Insights and Further Clarifications pp. 183-191

Cary Cherniss

Not Seeing Clearly With Cleary: What Test Bias Analyses Do and Do Not Tell Us pp. 192-205

Adam W. Meade and Scott Tonidandel

The Need for Even Further Clarity About Cleary pp. 206-209

Steven F. Cronshaw and Greg A. Chung-Yan

What Test Bias Analyses Do and Don't Tell Us: Let's Not Assume We Have a Can Opener pp. 210-212

David J. Woehr

Conceptual and Technical Issues in Conducting and Interpreting Differential Prediction Analyses pp. 213-217

Paul R. Sackett and Philip Bobko

Diagnosing When Evidence of Bias Is Problematic: Methodological Cookbooks and the Unfortunate Complexities of Reality pp. 218-223

Dan J. Putka, D. Matthew Trippe and Nicholas L. Vasilopoulos

Using Meta-Analysis to Increase Power in Differential Prediction Analyses pp. 224-227

Matthew J. Borneman

Biased Against Whom? The Problems of “Group” Definition and Membership in Test Bias Analyses pp. 228-231

Stephen M. Colarelli, Kyunghee Han and Chulguen Yang

Final Thoughts on Measurement Bias and Differential Prediction pp. 232-237

Adam W. Meade and Scott Tonidandel

Volume 3, issue 1, 2010

Recasting Leadership Development pp. 3-19

Morgan W. McCall

Ten Catalysts to Spark On-the-Job Development in Your Organization pp. 20-23

Paul R. Yost and Mary M. Plunkett

Power to the People: Where Has Personal Agency Gone in Leadership Development? pp. 24-27

D. Scott DeRue and Susan J. Ashford

Putting the Development Into Experiential Development pp. 28-32

Gina Scott Ligon and Samuel T. Hunter

Back to Persons: On Social-Cognitive Processes and Products of Leadership Development Experiences pp. 33-37

Peter G. Dominick, Paul Squires and Daniel Cervone

The Nature of Knowledge, Reflective Practitioners, and the Value of Experience pp. 38-40

Ryan E. Smerek

The Difficulties of Learning From Experience and the Need for Deliberate Practice pp. 41-44

David V. Day

Preparing for the Unthinkable: Leadership Development for Organizational Crises pp. 45-47

Benjamin E. Baran and Marisa Adelman

Lessons for Experience: Why Wait? pp. 48-51

R. Jeffrey Jackson and Douglas R. Lindsay

Grounding Leader Development: Cultural Perspectives pp. 52-55

Meena S. Wilson and Jeffrey Yip

Suggestions for New Research on Experience-Based Learning pp. 56-60

Sarah A. Hezlett

Peeling the Onion: Getting Inside Experience-Based Leadership Development pp. 61-68

Morgan W. McCall

The Social and Economic Imperative of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgendered Supportive Organizational Policies pp. 69-78

Eden B. King and José M. Cortina

Extending Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgendered Supportive Organizational Policies: Communities Matter Too pp. 79-81

Laura G. Barron and Michelle R. Hebl

Additional Agents of Change in Promoting Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgendered Inclusiveness in Organizations pp. 82-85

Larry R. Martinez and Michelle R. Hebl

The Cognitive Effects of Hiding One's Homosexuality in the Workplace pp. 86-89

Juan M. Madera

I'm Confused: How Failing to Value Sexual Identities at Work Sends Stakeholders Mixed Messages pp. 90-92

Sabrina D. Volpone and Derek R. Avery

Effects of Policy Change on Nonstigmatized Employees pp. 93-96

Kevin J. Eschleman and Martin P. Gooden

Recognizing the Need for a Humanistic Movement Within Industrial–Organizational Psychology pp. 97-99

Michael J. Zickar

The Individual, Corporations, and Society: To Whom Do Rights Belong? pp. 100-102

Edwin A. Locke

Stated and Unstated Opportunities and Barriers to Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgendered Supportive Organizations pp. 103-108

Eden B. King and José M. Cortina