Industrial and Organizational Psychology

2008 - 2025

From Cambridge University Press
Cambridge University Press, UPH, Shaftesbury Road, Cambridge CB2 8BS UK.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Kirk Stebbing ().

Access Statistics for this journal.
Is something missing from the series or not right? See the RePEc data check for the archive and series.

Volume 15, issue 4, 2022

Open science, closed doors: The perils and potential of open science for research in practice pp. 495-515

Richard A. Guzzo, Benjamin Schneider and Haig R. Nalbantian

Is open science rewarding A while hoping for B? pp. 516-519

Paul E. Spector

Open science practices in IWO psychology: Urban legends, misconceptions, and a false dichotomy pp. 520-524

Joachim Hüffmeier, Ann-Kathrin Torka, Elisabeth Jäckel and Philipp Schäpers

Open science and epistemic pluralism: A tale of many perils and some opportunities pp. 525-528

Andrea Bazzoli

Moving from opposition to taking ownership of open science to make discoveries that matter pp. 529-532

Oliver Weigelt, Kimberly A. French, Jessica de Bloom, Carolin Dietz, Michael Knoll, Jana Kühnel, Laurenz L. Meier, Roman Prem, Shani Pindek, Antje Schmitt, Christine J. Syrek and Floor Rink

Revisiting the paradox of replication: Is the solution to the paradox big data style research or something else? pp. 533-536

In-Sue Oh

Opening a “closed door”: A call for nuance in discussions of open science pp. 537-541

Jenelle A. Morgan, Brittany L. Lindsay and Chelsea Moran

Holding the door open for the practitioner community pp. 542-545

Jessica J. Sim

A brighter vision of the potential of open science for benefiting practice: A ManyOrgs proposal pp. 546-550

Christopher M. Castille, Tine Köhler and O’Boyle, Ernest H.

Openness maximizes advocacy pp. 551-553

Cort W. Rudolph and Hannes Zacher

Reckoning with racialized police violence: The role of I-O psychology pp. 554-577

Lindsay Y. Dhanani, Christopher W. Wiese, Brooks, LeVonte’ and Kyana Beckles

Identifying I-O and HRM practices is necessary but not sufficient for lasting change pp. 578-582

Kyle E. Brink

A trauma-informed approach is needed to reduce police misconduct pp. 583-587

Jana L. Raver and Megan McElheran

The socio-ecological model: A multifaced approach for I-O psychologists to design interventions targeted at reducing police violence pp. 588-591

Myia S. Williams and Janice Gassam Asare

Human values differentially motivate police actions pp. 592-598

Sharon Glazer and Cláudio V. Torres

Defunding is refunding: Community investments, not policing, create safety pp. 599-603

Christopher J. Waterbury and Nicholas A. Smith

Officer-involved domestic violence: A call for action among I-O psychologists pp. 604-608

Kimberly A. French and Keaton A. Fletcher

Investigating the dark side of personality: A case for derailer assessment in police pp. 609-611

Chase A. Winterberg and Peter D. Harms

Body-worn camera technologies can promote positive policing pp. 612-616

Daniel M. Ravid, Bradley D. Pitcher, Bradley J. Alge and Tara S. Behrend

The critical role of team processes and team reflexivity in the emergence and prevention of racialized police violence pp. 617-620

Mona Weiss

From simulations to real-world operations: Virtual reality training for reducing racialized police violence pp. 621-625

Jo M. Alanis and Rachael H. Pyram

Racialized police violence: Potential solutions from and for Germany pp. 626-629

Hannes Zacher and Cort W. Rudolph

Innovation in government succession planning: A case study pp. 630-638

Anne F. Marrelli

Volume 15, issue 3, 2022

Is cybervetting valuable? pp. 315-333

Annika Wilcox, Amanda K. Damarin and Steve McDonald

Too early to call: What we do (not) know about the validity of cybervetting pp. 334-341

Franz Wilhelm Mönke and Philipp Schäpers

Cybervetting is the latest symptom of a deeper problem pp. 342-347

Kyle E. Brink

The price of technology is responsibility: A discussion of threats created by cybervetting that employers must address to ensure equal employment opportunity pp. 348-351

William G. Obenauer

Holding cybervetting to the same standards as traditional vetting methods pp. 352-353

Greg A. Chung-Yan, Jewels T. L. Adair and Tabarak Baher

Considering artificial intelligence in hiring for cybervetting purposes pp. 354-356

Serge P. da Motta Veiga and Maria Figueroa-Armijos

A need to “veto” the “vett” in cybervetting to prevent DEI efforts from DIEing pp. 357-360

Aditya Simha and Gordon B. Schmidt

Avatar: The new employee? Creating online employment personas may benefit stigmatized employees pp. 361-364

Esenaman Batirov and Larry R. Martinez

Cybervetting: Facebook is dead, long live LinkedIn? pp. 365-370

Nicolas Roulin and Sébastien Fernandez

Social media information in assessment and implications for minoritized social identities pp. 371-377

Oluwadara Dahunsi, Vivian H. Luu, Cody Knight, Melissa F. Lok-Lee and Christine L. Nittrouer

Drawing on attributional augmenting to unlock the potential of cybervetting to combat gender discrimination in hiring pp. 378-381

Younsung Cho, Maura J. Mills and Angela R. Grotto

The business of cybervetting pp. 382-384

Kristine M. Kuhn

Expanding the I-O psychology mindset to organizational success pp. 385-402

Benjamin Schneider and Elaine D. Pulakos

Contextualizing the organizational mindset pp. 403-407

Joseph A. Carpini and Burak Oc

An expanding organizational mindset benefits all I-O psychologists pp. 408-412

Michael Nicholas Bazigos and Marc Sokol

Signaling a new mindset: Let’s swap SIOP for SWOP? pp. 413-414

Allen I. Kraut

Organizational differences in personnel selection: Learning from and moving beyond strategic human resource management research pp. 415-419

In-Sue Oh and Youngsang Kim

Learning from research on training and organizational performance how to do I-O research with an organizational mindset pp. 420-423

Alan M. Saks

Organizational success: The importance of conceptual clarity pp. 424-427

Nathaniel M. Voss, Stacy A. Stoffregen and Kelsey L. Couture

Organizational performance and the maturity of workforce practices pp. 428-431

Bill Curtis

Organizational outcomes: It’s not (only) a levels issue pp. 432-435

Joel Lefkowitz

We should also aim higher: I-O psychology applied to sustainable growth and development pp. 436-440

Mindy Shoss and Lori Foster

An urgent call for I-O psychologists to produce timelier technology research pp. 441-459

Jerod C. White, Daniel M. Ravid, Ian O. Siderits and Tara S. Behrend

Sensibility over urgency: Applying a prudent researcher standard to timelier technology research pp. 460-464

Daniel A. Gandara, Derek K. Nguyen, Kaushik Suryanarayanan, Reya Green, Julia Honda, Nalini Puri and Kristina N. Bauer

The importance of representativeness as well as timeliness in studying technology: Three additional suggestions pp. 465-468

Jenna A. Van Fossen, Rachael H. Pyram, Sandra L. Fisher and Michael E. Wasserman

“404 error—interdisciplinarity not found”: Removing barriers to technology research in I-O psychology pp. 469-474

Manuel F. Gonzalez and Yuliya M. Cheban

Facilitating timelier research with a novel classification of workplace technology pp. 475-478

Bin Wang, Yue Zhang and Beiling Li

Conceptual technology frameworks offer timelier and more influential research pp. 479-483

Neil Morelli and Renee Davis

How abduction can help produce timelier technology research pp. 484-486

Ilke Inceoglu

Catching up in two races: Applying technology design approaches to design technology research pp. 487-490

Michael Knoll

Practitioner-oriented recommendations for advancing I-O technological research pp. 491-494

Matthew J. Borneman and Amie Mansfield

Volume 15, issue 2, 2022

Online I-O graduate education: Where are we and where should we go? pp. 151-171

Kurt Kraiger, Sandra Fisher, Rebecca Grossman, Maura J. Mills and Traci Sitzmann

Evaluating online I-O graduate programs: An information-seeking guide for prospective students pp. 172-176

Thomas B. Ayres and Seth A. Osborn

Beyond learning outcomes: Creating equitable learning environments in online I-O graduate education pp. 177-180

Brittany N. Lynner and Hannah M. Finch

What does online I-O education really need? Perspectives of online program affiliates pp. 181-185

Kristi Logan, Clair Reynolds Kueny, Chelsea LeNoble, Diana Sanchez and Jeanie Whinghter

Keys to effective online I-O master’s programs: Ensuring employability pp. 186-189

Nancy J. Stone, Elizabeth L. Shoenfelt and Janet L. Kottke

The overlooked role of concurrent employment in online graduate education in industrial-organizational psychology pp. 190-194

Sarina M. Maneotis and Chi-Leigh Q. Warren

Optimizing an online I-O program: Tips and lessons learned from launching an online master’s program pp. 195-199

Afra S. Ahmad, Kevin C. Stagl, Steven Zhou and Stephen J. Zaccaro

Reflections on creating and maintaining supportive graduate program culture online: Lessons learned from a top-ranked doctoral program pp. 200-204

Debra A. Major, Kristen D. Eggler and Seterra D. Burleson

A central decision in online course design: To go synchronous or asynchronous? pp. 205-207

Ann-Marie R. Castille

Online graduate programs: Better equity for industrial-organizational psychologists among disadvantaged groups pp. 208-211

Caitlin M. Lapine and Aditi R. Sachdev

Additional (and not leaky) pipelines: Online faculty positions to diversify I-O psychology pp. 212-219

Liana Bernard, Larry R. Martinez and Kay Kulason

Ethical decision making in the 21st century: A useful framework for industrial-organizational psychologists pp. 220-235

George C. Banks, Deirdre J. Knapp, Li Lin, Chanda S. Sanders and James A. Grand

Advancing ethical decision making in industrial-organizational psychology pp. 236-240

Rodney L. Lowman

Increasing the saliency of ethical decision making for SIOP members pp. 241-245

Elizabeth L. Shoenfelt, Janet L. Kottke and Nancy J. Stone

Using inclusive assessments to support ethical decision making in organizations pp. 246-249

Kristin S. Allen and Mark Burnard

The new age of ethics: University-led education and student-led discussion pp. 250-254

Karyssa A. Courey and Makai A. Ruffin

Extending the ethical decision-making framework: Introducing the complexities and nuances of diversity and inclusion pp. 255-258

Aarti Polavarapu, Christopher Huynh and Nicholas P. Salter

How we can bring I-O psychology science and evidence-based practices to the public pp. 259-272

Steven G. Rogelberg, Eden B. King and Alexander Alonso

For the public, it might be an evidence-based practice not to listen to I-O psychologists pp. 273-276

Konrad Kulikowski

I-O psychologists as the leaders in the “Wittgensteinian Shortfall” recovery: Improving our science communication pp. 277-279

Nicholas A. Smith and Ann Hergatt Huffman

Bringing evidence to others: Know your audience first pp. 280-283

James D. Eyring

Better together: It’s time to unify, centralize, and market our competitive advantage pp. 284-288

Christopher T. Rotolo and Julian B. Allen

Science communication: Eight perils, but one pearl to make it all worth it pp. 289-293

Steven Zhou

Going upstream: Recommendations for training the next generation of I-O influencers pp. 294-297

Rachel A. Perpich, Rebecca M. Brossoit, Gwenith G. Fisher, Lisa M. Kath and James J. Kunz

Evidence-based case studies in I-O education for public impact pp. 298-301

Joseph Alexandre Carpini

Using the resources we have for community outreach: A community engagement assignment for graduate and undergraduate I-O students pp. 302-305

Janet L. Kottke and Kenneth S. Shultz

The Institute for Smarter Work doesn’t exist—but it could pp. 306-310

Benjamin E. Baran and Christopher W. Everett

Bringing I-O psychology to the (re)public pp. 311-313

Paul Yost and Kristine Reeves

Volume 15, issue 1, 2022

Job analysis and job classification for addressing pay inequality in organizations: Adjusting our methods within a shifting legal landscape pp. 1-45

Nicole Strah, Deborah E. Rupp and Scott B. Morris

In analyses of the gender pay gap, job analysis, and O*NET don’t get a lot of respect, but they should pp. 46-50

Jeffrey M. Conte, Jessica L. Robison and Andrew J. Tricarico

What makes jobs too dissimilar to compare in a pay equity analysis? pp. 51-54

Michael G. Aamodt and Cliff Haimann

Metrics for assessing similarity of jobs pp. 55-60

Leaetta M. Hough and Teresa L. Russell

If sex discrimination in pay is still a societal problem, job evaluation is the answer pp. 61-64

Gerald V. Barrett

Practicality of job analysis in today’s world of work pp. 65-69

Justin B. Keeler, Meagan E. Brock Baskin, Abbie Lambert, M. Suzanne Clinton and Jennifer Barger Johnson

Adding competency models to the pay equity toolbox pp. 70-72

Eric Popp, Kristin S. Allen and Sara Gutierrez

Minding employee pay equality policy perceptions pp. 73-75

Rick A. Laguerre

Side effects associated with organizational interventions: A perspective pp. 76-94

Logan L. Watts, Bradley E. Gray and Kelsey E. Medeiros

Open systems, closed interventions? A way forward requires systems thinking pp. 95-98

Shanique G. Brown and Julaine M. Fowlin

The power of process theories to better understand and detect consequences of organizational interventions pp. 99-104

Michael T. Braun, Goran Kuljanin, James A. Grand, Steve W. J. Kozlowski and Georgia T. Chao

A multilevel approach for advancing organizational interventions pp. 105-109

Chelsea A. LeNoble and Matthew F. Hudson

Organization-based participatory research: A framework to guide intervention research in I-O psychology pp. 110-112

Myia S. Williams, Vidhi H. Patel and Aditi R. Sachdev

Decolonizing intervention assessment: Qualitative and interdisciplinary approaches to understanding “side effects” pp. 113-116

Julia L. O. Beckel, Danielle M. Gardner and Joshua J. Prasad

Avoiding harm, benefits of interpersonal listening, and social equilibrium adjustment: An applied psychology approach to side effects of organizational interventions pp. 117-121

Guy Itzchakov, Justin B. Keeler, Walter J. Sowden, Walter Slipetz and Kent S. Faught

Understanding intervention effects using a desirability and foreseeability typology pp. 122-125

Joseph A Carpini and Christine Soo

The brighter side effects: Identification and attainment pp. 126-129

Nishka Khoobchandani, Shania Sharma, Alicia S. Davis and Jennifer Feitosa

Perfect is the enemy of good enough: Putting the side effects of intelligence testing in perspective pp. 130-134

In-Sue Oh

Educating future researchers with an eye toward intellectual humility pp. 135-136

Kelly G. Manix

Investigating the promise and pitfalls of pulse surveys pp. 137-149

Matt I. Brown